首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Proactive vs. reactive car driving: EEG evidence for different driving strategies of older drivers
【2h】

Proactive vs. reactive car driving: EEG evidence for different driving strategies of older drivers

机译:主动驾驶与被动驾驶:老龄驾驶员不同驾驶策略的脑电证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aging is associated with a large heterogeneity in the extent of age-related changes in sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. All these functions can influence the performance in complex tasks like car driving. The present study aims to identify potential differences in underlying cognitive processes that may explain inter-individual variability in driving performance. Younger and older participants performed a one-hour monotonous driving task in a driving simulator under varying crosswind conditions, while behavioral and electrophysiological data were recorded. Overall, younger and older drivers showed comparable driving performance (lane keeping). However, there was a large difference in driving lane variability within the older group. Dividing the older group in two subgroups with low vs. high driving lane variability revealed differences between the two groups in electrophysiological correlates of mental workload, consumption of mental resources, and activation and sustaining of attention: Older drivers with high driving lane variability showed higher frontal Alpha and Theta activity than older drivers with low driving lane variability and—with increasing crosswind—a more pronounced decrease in Beta activity. These results suggest differences in driving strategies of older and younger drivers, with the older drivers using either a rather proactive and alert driving strategy (indicated by low driving lane variability and lower Alpha and Beta activity), or a rather reactive strategy (indicated by high driving lane variability and higher Alpha activity).
机译:衰老与感觉,运动和认知功能与年龄相关的变化程度具有很大的异质性。所有这些功能都可能影响汽车等复杂任务的性能。本研究旨在确定潜在的认知过程中的潜在差异,这些差异可以解释驾驶表现中的个体差异。年龄较小的参与者在变化的侧风条件下在驾驶模拟器中执行了一个小时的单调驾驶任务,同时记录了行为和电生理数据。总体而言,年轻和年长的驾驶员表现出可比的驾驶性能(保持车道)。但是,在较年长的人群中,行车道可变性差异很大。将较老的人群分为行驶变化率低与较高的两个亚组,发现两组之间在心理负荷,心理资源消耗以及激活和维持注意力方面的电生理相关性存在差异:行驶性变化率高的老年驾驶员的前额较高与较老的驾驶员相比,Alpha和Theta的活动具有较低的行驶车道变化性,并且随着侧风的增加,Beta的活动也更加明显。这些结果表明,老年驾驶员和年轻驾驶员的驾驶策略有所不同,老年驾驶员使用比较主动和警惕的驾驶策略(由低车道可变性和较低的Alpha和Beta活动表示)或较被动的策略(由较高的驾驶能力表示)行驶车道的变化和较高的Alpha活动)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号