首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus
【2h】

A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus

机译:周围肌肉磁刺激作为慢性耳鸣反复经颅磁刺激的附加治疗的先导研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While brain stimulation techniques have been examined as treatment options for chronic tinnitus for many years, they have recently been extended to multimodal treatment approaches. As chronic tinnitus is often accompanied by comorbid muscular tension in the neck and back, we performed a one-arm pilot study to explore the feasibility of a new multimodal treatment approach. In detail, repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) of the back was performed before and after each session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the brain. Data of 41 patients were analyzed, all of which were treated with ten sessions of rTMS of the left prefrontal and left temporoparietal cortex followed by rPMS of the neck and back muscles. Tinnitus severity was measured using the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ). Neck pain was assessed using the neck pain and disability scale (NPAD). The new treatment approach was feasible and well accepted by the majority of patients. However, the overall patient group did not improve significantly in either of the questionnaires. If patients were divided in different subgroups depending on whether they were suffering from neck pain or somatosensory tinnitus, explorative post-hoc tests suggested differential effects: patients with both neck pain and somatosensory tinnitus had better outcomes than patients without those conditions or with neck pain only. This was true for both the TQ and the NPAD. This effect was of transient nature though: the TQ score went back to its baseline level after a follow-up period of 12 weeks. Based on our results we recommend that in studies that investigate tinnitus treatments targeting somatosensory afferents patients should be stratified according to somatic co-morbidities and somatosensory influence on the tinnitus percept.Clinical trial registration: , .
机译:尽管大脑刺激技术已经作为慢性耳鸣的治疗选择进行了多年研究,但它们最近已扩展到多模式治疗方法。由于慢性耳鸣常伴有颈部和背部的合并性肌肉紧张,因此我们进行了单臂先导研究,以探索新的多模式治疗方法的可行性。详细地,在每次重复的经颅颅脑磁刺激(rTMS)之前和之后进行背部的重复性外周磁刺激(rPMS)。分析了41例患者的数据,所有患者均接受了十次左前额叶和左颞顶皮质的rTMS治疗,随后是颈部和背部肌肉的rPMS治疗。使用耳鸣问卷(TQ)测量耳鸣的严重程度。使用颈部疼痛和残疾量表(NPAD)评估颈部疼痛。新的治疗方法是可行的,并为大多数患者所接受。但是,在所有问卷中,总体患者组均没有明显改善。如果根据患者是遭受颈部疼痛还是体感性耳鸣将患者分为不同的亚组,则探索性事后测试提示了不同的效果:患有颈部疼痛和体感性耳鸣的患者比没有这种情况或仅伴有颈部疼痛的患者的预后更好。对于TQ和NPAD都是如此。但是,这种效果是暂时性的:在12周的随访期后,TQ评分恢复至基线水平。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议在针对耳鸣传入体的耳鸣治疗研究中,应根据躯体合并症和耳鸣知觉的体感影响对患者进行分层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号