首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Differential Protein Dynamics of Regulators of G-protein Signaling: Role in Specificity of Small-molecule Inhibitors
【2h】

Differential Protein Dynamics of Regulators of G-protein Signaling: Role in Specificity of Small-molecule Inhibitors

机译:G蛋白信号调节剂的差异蛋白动力学:在小分子抑制剂特异性中的作用。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Small-molecule inhibitor selectivity may be influenced by variation in dynamics among members of a protein family. Regulator of G-protein Signaling (RGS) proteins are a family that plays a key role in G-Protein Coupled Receptor (GPCR) signaling by binding to active Gα subunits and accelerating GTP hydrolysis, thereby terminating activity. Thiadiazolidinones (TDZDs) inhibit the RGS-Gα interaction by covalent modification of cysteine residues in RGS proteins. Some differences in specificity may be explained by differences in the complement of cysteines among RGS proteins. However, key cysteines shared by RGS proteins inhibited by TDZDs are not exposed on the protein surface, and differences in potency exist among RGS proteins containing only buried cysteines. We hypothesize that differential exposure of buried cysteine residues among RGS proteins partially drives TDZD selectivity. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) studies and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to probe the dynamics of RGS4, RGS8, and RGS19, three RGS proteins inhibited at a range of potencies by TDZDs. When these proteins were mutated to contain a single, shared cysteine, RGS19 was found to be most potently inhibited. HDX studies revealed differences in α4 and α6 helix flexibility among RGS isoforms, with particularly high flexibility in RGS19. This could cause differences in cysteine exposure and lead to differences in potency of TDZD inhibition. MD simulations of RGS proteins revealed motions that correspond to solvent exposure observed in HDX, providing further evidence for a role of protein dynamics in TDZD selectivity.
机译:小分子抑制剂的选择性可能受蛋白质家族成员之间动力学变化的影响。 G蛋白信号转导(RGS)蛋白的调节剂是一个家族,通过与活性Gα亚基结合并加速GTP水解从而终止活性,在G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)信号转导中发挥关键作用。噻二唑酮(TDZDs)通过共价修饰RGS蛋白中的半胱氨酸残基来抑制RGS-Gα相互作用。某些特异性差异可以通过RGS蛋白之间的半胱氨酸补体差异来解释。但是,TDZDs抑制的RGS蛋白共有的关键半胱氨酸没有暴露在蛋白质表面,并且在仅包含半胱氨酸半胱氨酸的RGS蛋白之间存在效力差异。我们假设RGS蛋白之间的掩埋半胱氨酸残基的差异暴露部分驱动TDZD选择性。氢-氘交换(HDX)研究和分子动力学(MD)模拟用于探测RGS4,RGS8和RGS19的动力学,这三种RGS蛋白在一定范围内受TDZD抑制。当这些蛋白质突变为包含单个共享的半胱氨酸时,发现RGS19被最有效地抑制。 HDX研究揭示了RGS同工型之间α4和α6螺旋柔性的差异,其中RGS19的柔性特别高。这可能导致半胱氨酸暴露的差异,并导致TDZD抑制效力的差异。 MD对RGS蛋白质的MD模拟揭示了与在HDX中观察到的溶剂暴露相对应的运动,为蛋白质动力学在TDZD选择性中的作用提供了进一步的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号