首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Influence of Different Kinds of Incentives on Decision-Making and Cognitive Control in Adolescent Development: A Review of Behavioral and Neuroscientific Studies
【2h】

The Influence of Different Kinds of Incentives on Decision-Making and Cognitive Control in Adolescent Development: A Review of Behavioral and Neuroscientific Studies

机译:不同类型的激励对青少年发育决策和认知控制的影响:行为和神经科学研究述评

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A number of recent hypothetical models on adolescent development take a dual-systems perspective and propose an imbalance in the maturation of neural systems underlying reward-driven and control-related behavior. In particular, such models suggest that the relative dominance of the early emerging subcortical reward system over the later emerging prefrontal-guided control system leads to higher risk-taking and sensation-seeking behavior in mid-adolescents. Here, we will review recent empirical evidence from behavioral and neuroscientific studies examining interactions between these systems and showing that empirical evidence in support for the view of a higher sensitivity to rewards in mid-adolescents is rather mixed. One possible explanation for this may be the use of different kinds and amounts of incentives across studies. We will therefore include developmental studies comparing the differential influence of primary and secondary incentives, as well as those investigating within the class of secondary incentives the effects of monetary, cognitive, or social incentives. We hypothesized that the value of receiving sweets or sours, winning or losing small or large amounts of money, and being accepted or rejected from a peer group may also changes across development, and thereby might modulate age differences in decision-making and cognitive control. Our review revealed that although developmental studies directly comparing different kinds of incentives are rather scarce, results of various studies rather consistently showed only minor age differences in the impact of incentives on the behavioral level. In tendency, adolescents were more sensitive to higher amounts of incentives and larger uncertainty of receiving them, as well as to social incentives such as the presence of peers observing them. Electrophysiological studies showed that processing efficiency was enhanced during anticipation of incentives and receiving them, irrespective of incentive type. Again, we found no strong evidence for interactions with age across studies. Finally, functional brain imaging studies revealed evidence for overlapping brain regions activated during processing of primary and secondary incentives, as well as social and non-social incentives. Adolescents recruited similar reward-related and control-related brain regions as adults did, but to a different degree. Implications for future research will be discussed.
机译:关于青少年发育的许多最新假设模型都采用双重系统的观点,并提出了基于奖励驱动和控制相关行为的神经系统成熟度的不平衡现象。特别是,这些模型表明,较早出现的皮层下奖励系统相对较晚出现的前额叶引导控制系统的相对优势导致了青少年中期较高的冒险和寻求感觉的行为。在这里,我们将回顾来自行为和神经科学研究的最新经验证据,这些研究检查了这些系统之间的相互作用,并表明支持对中期奖励的更高敏感性的观点的经验证据相当混杂。一个可能的解释可能是整个研究中使用了不同种类和数量的激励措施。因此,我们将进行发展性研究,比较初级和次级激励的差异影响,以及在次级激励类别中调查货币,认知或社会激励影响的研究。我们假设,接受甜食或酸酒,赢得或损失少量或大量金钱以及被同龄人团体接受或拒绝的价值在整个发展过程中也可能发生变化,从而可能会影响决策和认知控制中的年龄差异。我们的评论表明,尽管直接比较不同种类的激励措施的发展研究很少,但各种研究的结果一致地表明,在激励措施对行为水平的影响上,年龄差异很小。从趋势上看,青少年对更高的激励措施和更大的不确定性以及对社会激励措施(例如有同伴观察他们的存在)更加敏感。电生理研究表明,在预期奖励和接受奖励的过程中,无论奖励类型如何,处理效率都会提高。同样,我们没有发现有力的证据表明研究之间存在年龄差异。最后,功能性脑成像研究揭示了在主要和次要激励以及社会和非社会激励过程中激活的重叠大脑区域的证据。青少年招募了与成年人相似的与奖励相关和与控制相关的大脑区域,但是程度不同。将讨论对未来研究的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号