首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Lab to Field Assessment of the Ecotoxicological Impact of Chlorpyrifos Isoproturon or Tebuconazole on the Diversity and Composition of the Soil Bacterial Community
【2h】

Lab to Field Assessment of the Ecotoxicological Impact of Chlorpyrifos Isoproturon or Tebuconazole on the Diversity and Composition of the Soil Bacterial Community

机译:毒死rif异丙隆或戊唑醇对土壤细菌群落多样性和组成的生态毒理学影响的实验室现场评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pesticides are intentionally applied to agricultural fields for crop protection. They can harm non-target organisms such as soil microorganisms involved in important ecosystem functions with impacts at the global scale. Within the frame of the pesticide registration process, the ecotoxicological impact of pesticides on soil microorganisms is still based on carbon and nitrogen mineralization tests, despite the availability of more extensive approaches analyzing the abundance, activity or diversity of soil microorganisms. In this study, we used a high-density DNA microarray (PhyloChip) and 16S rDNA amplicon next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze the impact of the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (CHL), the phenyl-urea herbicide isoproturon (IPU), or the triazole fungicide tebuconazole (TCZ) on the diversity and composition of the soil bacterial community. To our knowledge, it is the first time that the combination of these approaches are applied to assess the impact of these three pesticides in a lab-to-field experimental design. The PhyloChip analysis revealed that although no significant changes in the composition of the bacterial community were observed in soil microcosms exposed to the pesticides, significant differences in detected operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were observed in the field experiment between pesticide treatments and control for all three tested pesticides after 70 days of exposure. NGS revealed that the bacterial diversity and composition varied over time. This trend was more marked in the microcosm than in the field study. Only slight but significant transient effects of CHL or TCZ were observed in the microcosm and the field study, respectively. IPU was not found to significantly modify the soil bacterial diversity or composition. Our results are in accordance with conclusions of the Environmental Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which concluded that these three pesticides may have a low risk toward soil microorganisms.
机译:农药故意用于农业领域以保护作物。它们可以损害非目标生物,例如参与重要生态系统功能的土壤微生物,并在全球范围内产生影响。在农药注册过程的框架内,尽管可以使用更广泛的方法来分析土壤微生物的丰度,活性或多样性,但农药对土壤微生物的生态毒理影响仍然基于碳和氮矿化试验。在这项研究中,我们使用了高密度DNA微阵列(PhyloChip)和16S rDNA扩增子下一代测序(NGS)来分析有机磷酸酯杀虫剂毒死rif(CHL),苯脲类除草剂异丙隆(IPU)或三唑类杀菌剂戊唑醇(TCZ)对土壤细菌群落的多样性和组成的影响。据我们所知,这是第一次在实验室到现场的实验设计中将这些方法的组合用于评估这三种农药的影响。 PhyloChip分析显示,尽管在暴露于农药的土壤微观世界中未观察到细菌群落组成的显着变化,但在实地试验中,对这三种农药的处理与对照之间的实测分类单位(OTU)均存在显着差异。暴露70天后测试农药。 NGS揭示细菌的多样性和组成随时间变化。这种趋势在微观世界中比在实地研究中更为明显。在微观和实地研究中,仅分别观察到CHL或TCZ的轻微但显着的瞬态效应。未发现IPU会显着改变土壤细菌的多样性或组成。我们的结果与环境食品安全局(EFSA)的结论一致,该结论得出结论,这三种农药对土壤微生物的风险可能较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号