首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Distinct Oceanic Microbiomes From Viruses to Protists Located Near the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
【2h】

Distinct Oceanic Microbiomes From Viruses to Protists Located Near the Antarctic Circumpolar Current

机译:从病毒到位于南极绕极洋流附近的原生生物的独特海洋微生物群系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Microbes occupy diverse ecological niches and only through recent advances in next generation sequencing technologies have the true microbial diversity been revealed. Furthermore, lack of perceivable marine barriers to genetic dispersal (i.e., mountains or islands) has allowed the speculation that organisms that can be easily transported by currents and therefore proliferate everywhere. That said, ocean currents are now commonly being recognized as barriers for microbial dispersal. Here we analyzed samples collected from a total of six stations, four located in the Indian Ocean, and two in the Southern Ocean. Amplicon sequencing was used to characterize both prokaryotic and eukaryotic plankton communities, while shotgun sequencing was used for the combined environmental DNA (eDNA), microbial eDNA (meDNA), and viral fractions. We found that Cyanobacteria dominated the prokaryotic component in the South-West Indian Ocean, while γ-Proteobacteria dominated the South-East Indian Ocean. A combination of γ- and α-Proteobacteria dominated the Southern Ocean. Alveolates dominated almost exclusively the eukaryotic component, with variation in the ratio of Protoalveolata and Dinoflagellata depending on station. However, an increase in haptophyte relative abundance was observed in the Southern Ocean. Similarly, the viral fraction was dominated by members of the order Caudovirales across all stations; however, a higher presence of nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (mainly chloroviruses and mimiviruses) was observed in the Southern Ocean. To our knowledge, this is the first that a statistical difference in the microbiome (from viruses to protists) between the subtropical Indian and Southern Oceans. We also show that not all phylotypes can be found everywhere, and that meDNA is not a suitable resource for monitoring aquatic microbial diversity.
机译:微生物占据着多样化的生态环境,只有通过下一代测序技术的最新发展,才可以揭示出真正的微生物多样性。此外,由于缺乏对遗传扩散的可理解的海洋障碍(即山脉或岛屿),因此推测,可以容易地通过水流运输并因此在各处扩散的生物。也就是说,洋流现在通常被认为是微生物扩散的障碍。在这里,我们分析了从总共六个台站(四个位于印度洋,两个位于南洋)收集的样本。扩增子测序可用于鉴定原核和真核浮游生物群落,而shot弹枪测序可用于组合的环境DNA(eDNA),微生物eDNA(meDNA)和病毒级分。我们发现蓝细菌在西南印度洋中占主导地位,而γ-变形杆菌在东南印度洋中占据主导地位。 γ-和α-变形杆菌的组合主导了南大洋。肺泡几乎只占真核生物的组成部分,原肺泡和恐龙鞭毛虫的比例随站位而变化。然而,在南大洋观察到触藻植物相对丰度增加。同样,在所有站中,病毒级分都由伪病毒科的成员所控制;但是,在南大洋观察到核质大DNA病毒(主要是叶绿病毒和mimiviruses)的存在率更高。据我们所知,这是第一个亚热带印度洋和南洋洋之间微生物组(从病毒到原生生物)的统计差异。我们还表明,并非在所有地方都能找到所有系统型,并且meDNA并不是监测水生微生物多样性的合适资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号