首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Time Perspective Biases Are Associated With Poor Sleep Quality Daytime Sleepiness and Lower Levels of Subjective Well-Being Among Older Adults
【2h】

Time Perspective Biases Are Associated With Poor Sleep Quality Daytime Sleepiness and Lower Levels of Subjective Well-Being Among Older Adults

机译:时间透视偏见与较差的睡眠质量白天嗜睡和较低的成年人主观幸福感相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study examined the extent to which individual differences in time perspective, i.e., habitual way of relating to the personal past, present, and future, are associated with sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in a sample of older adults. The participants (N = 437, 60–90 years) completed the Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire (KSQ), a the Swedish version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (S-ZTPI), and two ratings of subjective well-being (SWB) (life satisfaction, happiness). Based on established relationships between dimension of time perspective and other variables (e.g., depression) and relations between negative retrospection (rumination) and negative prospection (worry) in prior studies, we expected higher scores on Past Negative and Future Negative to be linked to poor sleep quality and (indirectly) increased daytime sleepiness. Moreover, we examined the possibility that variations in perceived sleep and sleepiness during the day mediates the expected association between an aggregate measure of deviations from a so called balanced time perspective (DBTP) and SWB. In regression analyses controlling for demographic factors (age, sex, and work status), higher scores on Past Negative and Future Negative predicted poorer sleep quality and higher levels of daytime sleepiness. Additionally, most of the association between time perspective and daytime sleepiness was accounted for by individual differences in sleep quality. Finally, structural equation modeling yielded results consistent with the hypothesis that variations in sleep mediate part of the negative relationship between DBTP and SWB. Given that good sleep is essential to multiple aspects of health, future studies evaluating relationships between time perspective and adverse health outcomes should consider sleep quality as a potentially contributing factor.
机译:这项研究检验了老年人样本中时间观点上个体差异的程度,即与个人过去,现在和未来相关的习惯方式与睡眠质量和白天嗜睡的关联程度。参与者(N = 437,60-90岁)完成了Karolinska睡眠问卷(KSQ),这是瑞典版的《津巴多时空透视表》(S-ZTPI),并且对主观幸福感(SWB)进行了两个评分(生活)满意,幸福)。根据时间观点和其他变量(例如抑郁)的维度之间的既定关系以及先前研究中的消极回顾(反思)与消极前景(担忧)之间的关系,我们预计过去负面和未来负面的较高分数与贫困率相关睡眠质量和(间接)增加日间嗜睡。此外,我们检查了白天感知睡眠和嗜睡的变化介导了从所谓的平衡时间角度(DBTP)到偏差的总体度量与SWB之间的预期关联的可能性。在控制人口统计学因素(年龄,性别和工作状态)的回归分析中,过去消极和未来消极的得分越高,预测的睡眠质量越差,白天的嗜睡程度更高。另外,时间观点和白天嗜睡之间的大多数关联是由睡眠质量的个体差异引起的。最后,结构方程模型得出的结果与以下假设相符:睡眠差异会介导DBTP和SWB之间的负相关关系。鉴于良好的睡眠对于健康的各个方面都是必不可少的,因此未来的评估时间观点与不良健康后果之间关系的研究应将睡眠质量视为潜在的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号