首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges
【2h】

Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges

机译:SAMPL6八酸主客体挑战的结合自由能预测中的伞式采样和双重解耦方法比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We calculate the absolute binding free energies of tetra-methylated octa-acids host-guest systems as a part of the SAMPL6 blind challenge (receipt ID vq30p). We employed two different free energy simulation methods, i.e., the umbrella sampling (US) and double decoupling method (DDM). The US method was used with the weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM) (US-WHAM scheme). In the DDM scheme, Hamiltonian replica-exchange method (HREM) was combined with the Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR) (HREM-BAR scheme). We obtained initial binding poses via molecular docking using GalaxyDock-HG program, which is developed for the SAMPL challenge. The root mean square deviation (RMSD) and the mean absolute deviations (MAD) using US-WHAM scheme were 1.33 and 1.02 kcal/mol, respectively. The MAD was the top among all submissions, however the correlation with respect to experiment was unexceptional. While the RMSD and MAD via HREM-BAR scheme were greater than US-WHAM scheme, (i.e., 2.09 and 1.76 kcal/mol), their correlations were slightly better than US-WHAM. The correlation between the two methods was high. Further discussion on the DDM method can be found in a companion paper by Han et al. (receipt ID 3z83m) in the same issue.
机译:我们计算四甲基化的八酸主机客体系统的绝对结合自由能,作为SAMPL6盲挑战(接收ID vq30p)的一部分。我们采用了两种不同的自由能模拟方法,即伞形采样(US)和双解耦方法(DDM)。 US方法与加权直方图分析方法(WHAM)(US-WHAM方案)一起使用。在DDM方案中,将哈密顿副本交换方法(HREM)与Bennett接受率(BAR)(HREM-BAR方案)相结合。我们使用针对SAMPL挑战开发的GalaxyDock-HG程序通过分子对接获得了初始结合姿势。使用US-WHAM方案的均方根偏差(RMSD)和平均绝对偏差(MAD)分别为1.33 kcal / mol和1.02 kcal / mol。在所有提交的材料中,MAD排名最高,但是与实验的相关性却毫不例外。虽然通过HREM-BAR方案的RMSD和MAD大于US-WHAM方案(即2.09和1.76 kcal / mol),但它们的相关性略好于US-WHAM。两种方法之间的相关性很高。关于DDM方法的进一步讨论可以在Han等人的随行论文中找到。 (收据ID 3z83m)在同一期中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号