首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychiatry >Social Cognition in Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparisons
【2h】

Social Cognition in Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparisons

机译:精神分裂症和自闭症谱系障碍的社会认知:系统比较和直接比较的荟萃分析。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Deficits in social cognition are well-recognized in both schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, it is less clear how social cognition deficits differ between both disorders and what distinct mechanisms may underlie such differences. We aimed at reviewing available evidence from studies directly comparing social cognitive performance between individuals with schizophrenia and ASD.>Methods: We performed a systematic review of literature up to May 22, 2018 on Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Search terms included combinations of the keywords “social cognition,” “theory of mind,” “autism,” “Asperger,” “psychosis,” and “schizophrenia.” Two researchers independently selected and extracted data according to PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for performance on social cognitive tasks evaluating: (1) emotion perception; (2) theory of mind (ToM); (3) emotional intelligence (managing emotions score of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test); and (4) social skills.>Results: We identified 19 eligible studies for meta-analysis including a total of 1,040 patients (558 with schizophrenia and 482 with ASD). Eight studies provided data on facial emotion perception that evidenced a better performance by participants with schizophrenia compared to those with ASD (Hedges' g = 0.43; p = 0.031). No significant differences were found between groups in the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (8 studies; Hedges' g = 0.22; p = 0.351), other ToM tasks (9 studies; Hedges' g = −0.03; p = 0.903), emotional intelligence (3 studies; Hedges' g = −0.17; p = 0.490), and social skills (3 studies; Hedges' g = 0.86; p = 0.056). Participants' age was a significant moderator of effect size in emotion perception and RMET analyzes, with larger differences favoring patients with schizophrenia being observed in studies with younger participants.>Conclusions: The instruments that are currently available to evaluate social cognition poorly differentiate between individuals with schizophrenia and ASD. Combining behavioral tasks with neurophysiologic assessments may better characterize the differences in social cognition between both disorders.
机译:>背景:精神分裂症和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)都已充分认识到社交认知的缺陷。然而,尚不清楚两种疾病之间的社会认知缺陷如何不同,以及这些差异可能是由哪些不同的机制引起的。我们旨在审查直接比较患有精神分裂症和ASD的个体之间的社会认知表现的研究中可用的证据。>方法:我们对截至2018年5月22日在Pubmed,Web of Science和Scopus。搜索字词包含关键字“社会认知”,“心理理论”,“自闭症”,“阿斯伯格”,“精神病”和“精神分裂症”的组合。两名研究人员根据PRISMA准则独立选择和提取了数据。对社会认知任务的绩效进行随机荟萃分析,评估:(1)情绪感知; (2)心智理论(ToM); (3)情商(管理Mayer-Salovey-Caruso情商测验的情绪分数); >结果:我们确定了19项符合条件的荟萃分析研究,包括1,040例患者(558例精神分裂症患者和482例ASD患者)。八项研究提供了关于面部情感知觉的数据,这些数据证明精神分裂症参与者的表现优于ASD的参与者(Hedges's g = 0.43; p = 0.031)。在“阅读眼神”测试(8个研究; Hedges的g = 0.22; p = 0.351),其他ToM任务(9个研究; Hedges的g = −0.03; p = 0.903)中,各组之间没有发现明显差异。情绪智力(3个研究; Hedges'g = -0.17; p = 0.490)和社交技能(3个研究; Hedges'g = 0.86; p = 0.056)。参与者的年龄是情绪感知和RMET分析中效应大小的重要调节剂,在较年轻参与者的研究中观察到更大的差异有助于精神分裂症患者。>结论:目前可用于评估社交活动的工具精神分裂症和自闭症患者之间的认知差。将行为任务与神经生理学评估相结合,可以更好地表征两种疾病之间社会认知的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号