首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications
【2h】

Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications

机译:四室模型中DXA体量方程对体重指数和腰围分类不同的成年人的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the validity of 4-compartment (4C) model body fat percent (BF%) estimates when using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) derived body volume (BV) equations (4C-DXA1 and 4C-DXA2) in adults with varying body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) classifications. Each model was compared to a criterion 4C model with air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) generated BV (4C-ADP). Participants were categorized as normal weight (n = 40; NW = BMI<25.0kg/m2); overweight (n = 40; OWBMI = BMI≥25.0 kg/m2); and overweight with at-risk WC (n = 35; OWBMI+WC = BMI≥25.0 kg/m2 and WC≥88.0cm for women and 102.0cm for men). 4C-DXA1 produced lower BF% than that derived using the 4C-ADP in NW (CE = -3.0%; p<0.001) while 4C-DXA2 was significantly higher (CE = 4.8%; p<0.001). The SEE and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were lower for 4C-DXA2 (1.24% and ±2.5%, respectively) than 4C-DXA1 (2.59% and ±5.0%, respectively) and proportional bias was present for both (p<0.05). 4C-DXA1 BF% was not significant in OWBMI (CE = -0.5%; p = 0.112) whereas 4C-DXA2 was higher (CE = 4.5%; p<0.001). The SEE and 95% LOA were lower for 4C-DXA2 (1.20% and ±2.9%, respectively) than 4C-DXA1 (1.92% and ±3.9%, respectively) in OWBMI. Proportional bias was present for 4C-DXA1 (p = 0.007), but not 4C-DXA2 (p = 0.832). 4C-DXA1 and 4C-DXA2 produced significantly higher BF% in OWBMI+WC (CE = 2.2 and 2.3%, respectively; both p<0.001). The SEE and 95% LOA remained lower for 4C-DXA2 (1.15% and ±2.5%, respectively) than 4C-DXA1 (1.84% and ±3.8%, respectively). There was proportional bias for 4C-DXA2 (p = 0.020), but not 4C-DXA1 (p = 0.183) in OWBMI+WC. Only one prediction model (i.e., 4C-DXA1 in OWBMI+WC) revealed valid estimates of BF%. Practitioners are encouraged to use criteria for both BMI and WC when utilizing DXA-derived BV in 4C-models for normal and overweight populations.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定使用双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)导出的身体体积(BV)方程(4C-DXA1和4C)时4舱(4C)模型人体脂肪百分比(BF%)估计的有效性-DXA2)在具有不同体重指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)分类的成年人中。将每个模型与采用空气体积体积描记法(ADP)生成的BV(4C-ADP)的标准4C模型进行比较。参加者归类为正常体重(n = 40; NW = BMI <25.0kg / m 2 );超重(n = 40; OWBMI =BMI≥25.0kg / m 2 ); WC高危人群(n = 35; OWBMI + WC =BMI≥25.0kg / m 2 ,女性WC≥88.0cm,男性102.0cm)。在西北地区,4C-DXA1产生的BF%低于使用4C-ADP获得的BF%(CE = -3.0%; p <0.001),而4C-DXA2则显着更高(CE = 4.8%; p <0.001)。 4C-DXA2(分别为1.24%和±2.5%)的SEE和95%一致性极限(LOA)低于4C-DXA1(分别为2.59%和±5.0%)和两者均存在比例偏差(p <0.05)。 OWBMI中4C-DXA1 BF%不显着(CE = -0.5%; p = 0.112),而4C-DXA2较高(CE = 4.5%; p <0.001)。 OWBMI中4C-DXA2的SEE和95%LOA分别较低(分别为1.20%和±2.9%)和4C-DXA1(分别为1.92%和±3.9%)。 4C-DXA1存在比例偏差(p = 0.007),而4C-DXA2不存在比例偏差(p = 0.832)。 4C-DXA1和4C-DXA2在OWBMI + WC中产生了更高的BF%(CE分别为2.2和2.3%;均p <0.001)。 4C-DXA2的SEE和95%LOA分别低于4C-DXA1(分别为1.84%和±3.8%)(分别为1.15%和±2.5%)。 OWBMI + WC中4C-DXA2(p = 0.020)有比例偏差,但4C-DXA1(p = 0.183)没有。只有一个预测模型(即OWBMI + WC中的4C-DXA1)显示了BF%的有效估算值。在正常人群和超重人群中,在4C模型中使用DXA衍生的BV时,鼓励从业人员同时使用BMI和WC的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号