首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychiatry >Formal Thought Disorders–Historical Roots
【2h】

Formal Thought Disorders–Historical Roots

机译:形式性思想障碍-历史根源

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this article the authors intend to review in an intelligible and comprehensive way the historical roots of Formal Thought Disorders. Early descriptions of thought disorders date back to the XIX century with Esquirol, but it was in the first half of the XX century that several authors introduced the main features of the actual concept of Formal Thought Disorders. Emil Kraepelin described akataphasia (inability to find the appropriate expression for a thought) in patients with dementia praecox (a term that some years later was replaced by schizophrenia). Bleuler and Kretschmer also identified in schizophrenic patients a generalized “loosening of associations” and Carl Schneider described several Formal Thought Disorders such as derailment, fusion, omission, suspension and driveling. At the end of the XX century Nancy Andreasen studied the classical descriptions regarding Formal Thought Disorders, reclassified them and also introduced a scale to assess them. Although the specificity of these symptoms in schizophrenia and psychosis has been a source of controversy among the different authors, the importance given to their presence in these mental disorders is universal. We defend that it is crucial that these historical and conceptual elements are grasped in order to assess Formal Thought Disorders for clinical and research purposes.
机译:在本文中,作者打算以一种可理解且全面的方式来审查形式思想障碍的历史根源。关于思想障碍的早期描述可以追溯到19世纪的Esquirol,但是在20世纪上半叶,几位作者介绍了形式思想障碍的实际概念的主要特征。埃米尔·克拉佩林(Emil Kraepelin)描述了老年痴呆症(几年后被精神分裂症取代的术语)患者的无语症(无法找到合适的表达方式)。 Bleuler和Kretschmer在精神分裂症患者中还发现了普遍的“交往松动”,Carl Schneider描述了几种形式化思维障碍,例如脱轨,融合,遗漏,悬吊和打车。二十世纪末,南希·安德里亚森(Nancy Andreasen)研究了有关形式思维障碍的经典描述,对其进行了重新分类,并引入了一个量表来评估它们。尽管这些症状在精神分裂症和精神病中的特异性已引起不同作者之间的争议,但对它们在这些精神障碍中的存在的重视是普遍的。我们认为,掌握这些历史和概念要素对于评估临床和研究目的的正式思想障碍至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号