首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Expert and Novice Performers Respond Differently to Attentional Focus Cues for Speed Jump Roping
【2h】

Expert and Novice Performers Respond Differently to Attentional Focus Cues for Speed Jump Roping

机译:专家和新手表演者对注意力集中线索对跳绳的反应不同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Directing attention to an external focus has been shown to facilitate motor performance. For expert performers, however, results have been mixed. Additionally, little is currently known about how focus cues affect the performance of complex continuous whole-body coordination tasks involving object manipulation such as jump roping. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of attentional focus cues on single-rope speed jumping by experts and novices. The cues directed attention toward the upper (UP) or lower (LB) body and either internally (IN) or externally (EX). Participants (N = 30) completed bouts of speed jumping during a baseline trial and under experimental conditions (UPIN, UPEX, LBIN, LBEX). Jumps and errors were recorded for each trial. Number of jumps (NJ) and errors (NE) were analyzed using separate Friedman’s Tests comparing for each group to compare trials, with Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests for post hoc comparisons. Cumulative number of jumps (CNJ) and errors (CNE) for each condition were compared using separate Friedman’s Tests with Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests for post hoc comparisons. For experts, baseline NJ was significantly higher than NJ for each trial under the UPIN, UPEX, and LBIN conditions. No differences between baseline NE and any trials were detected. Additionally, no differences were detected between conditions for NJ or NE. For novices, baseline NJ and NE were significantly higher and lower, respectively, compared to Trial 1 under the LBEX condition. Both the UPIN and UPEX conditions produced higher CNJ and lower CNE than the LBIN and LBEX conditions, respectively. Results showed that experts and novices responded in distinctly different patterns to the four conditions. Experts showed degraded performance under the UPIN, UPEX, and LBIN conditions whereas novices only showed temporarily degraded performance under the LBEX condition. These findings may reflect differences in mastery of whole-body coordination and are partially consistent with the Constrained Action Hypothesis (CAH) despite not supporting specific predictions related to the benefit of external focus cues.
机译:已经显示出将注意力集中在外部焦点上可以提高电机性能。但是,对于专业演奏家来说,结果好坏参半。此外,目前关于聚焦提示如何影响涉及对象操纵(例如跳绳)的复杂连续全身协调任务的性能知之甚少。这项研究的目的是研究专家和新手注意注意力线索对单绳速度跳跃的影响。提示将注意力引向上(UP)或下(LB)主体以及内部(IN)或外部(EX)。参与者(N = 30)在基线试验期间和实验条件(UPIN,UPEX,LBIN,LBEX)下完成了速度跳跃动作。记录每个试验的跳跃和错误。跳数(NJ)和错误(NE)分别通过每组的弗里德曼测验进行比较以进行比较,而威尔科克森符号秩检验用于事后比较。使用单独的Friedman检验和Wilcoxon Signed-Rank检验对每种情况的累积跳跃数(CNJ)和错误(CNE)进行事后比较。对于专家而言,在UPIN,UPEX和LBIN条件下,每个试验的基线NJ均显着高于NJ。基线NE与任何试验之间均未发现差异。此外,在NJ或NE的条件之间未检测到差异。对于新手,与LBEX条件下的试验1相比,基线NJ和NE分别显着较高和较低。与LBIN和LBEX条件相比,UPIN和UPEX条件分别产生更高的CNJ和更低的CNE。结果表明,专家和新手对四种情况的反应方式截然不同。专家显示在UPIN,UPEX和LBIN条件下性能下降,而新手仅显示在LBEX条件下性能暂时下降。这些发现可能反映了对全身协调的掌握程度的差异,并且尽管不支持与外部关注线索的益处有关的特定预测,但与约束行动假说(CAH)部分一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号