首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Dead or Alive; or Does It Really Matter? Level of Congruency Between Trophic Modes in Total and Active Fungal Communities in High Arctic Soil
【2h】

Dead or Alive; or Does It Really Matter? Level of Congruency Between Trophic Modes in Total and Active Fungal Communities in High Arctic Soil

机译:死或生;还是真的重要吗?高北极土壤全营养模式与活性真菌群落营养模式的一致性水平

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Describing dynamics of belowground organisms, such as fungi, can be challenging. Results of studies based on environmental DNA (eDNA) may be biased as the template does not discriminate between metabolically active cells and dead biomass. We analyzed ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) coextracted from 48 soil samples collected from a manipulated snow depth experiment in two distinct vegetation types in Svalbard, in the High Arctic. Our main goal was to compare if the rDNA and rRNA metabarcoding templates produced congruent results that would lead to consistent ecological interpretation. Data derived from both rDNA and rRNA clustered according to vegetation types. Different sets of environmental variables explained the community composition based on the metabarcoding template. rDNA and rRNA-derived community composition of symbiotrophs and saprotrophs, unlike pathotrophs, clustered together in a similar way as when the community composition was analyzed using all OTUs in the study. Mean OTU richness was higher for rRNA, especially in symbiotrophs. The metabarcoding template was more important than vegetation type in explaining differences in richness. The proportion of symbiotrophic, saprotrophic and functionally unassigned reads differed between rDNA and rRNA, but showed similar trends. There was no evidence for increased snow depth influence on fungal community composition or richness. Our findings suggest that template choice may be especially important for estimating biodiversity, such as richness and relative abundances, especially in Helotiales and Agaricales, but not for inferring community composition. Differences in study results originating from rDNA or rRNA may directly impact the ecological conclusions of one’s study, which could potentially lead to false conclusions on the dynamics of microbial communities in a rapidly changing Arctic.
机译:描述地下生物(例如真菌)的动态可能具有挑战性。由于模板不能区分代谢活性细胞和死生物质,因此基于环境DNA(eDNA)的研究结果可能会有偏差。我们分析了从高海拔北极地区斯瓦尔巴特群岛两种不同植被类型的经操纵雪深实验收集的48个土壤样品中共同提取的核糖体DNA(rDNA)和核糖体RNA(rRNA)。我们的主要目标是比较rDNA和rRNA元条形码模板产生的结果是否一致,从而导致一致的生态学解释。来自rDNA和rRNA的数据根据​​植被类型而聚类。不同的环境变量集解释了基于元条形码模板的社区组成。与共营养体和共营养体不同,rDNA和rRNA衍生的共生体和腐生生物的群落组成以与研究中使用所有OTU分析群落组成相似的方式聚集在一起。 rRNA的平均OTU富集度较高,尤其是在共生菌中。在解释丰富度差异方面,元条形码模板比植被类型更为重要。 rDNA和rRNA之间共生,腐养和功能未指定读段的比例不同,但显示出相似的趋势。没有证据表明雪深增加对真菌群落组成或丰富度的影响。我们的研究结果表明,模板的选择对于估计生物多样性(例如丰富度和相对丰度)尤其重要,尤其是在Helotiales和Agaricales中,但对于推断社区组成不是特别重要。来自rDNA或rRNA的研究结果的差异可能会直接影响一个人的研究的生态结论,这可能会导致在迅速变化的北极地区微生物群落动态方面得出错误的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号