首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of radiological outcomes and complications between single-level and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage–plate fusion system
【2h】

Comparison of radiological outcomes and complications between single-level and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage–plate fusion system

机译:聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼板融合系统对单层和多层颈椎前路椎间盘切除术与融合术(ACDF)的放射学结果和并发症的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to compare the differences in radiological outcomes and complications between single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage–plate fusion system.Fifty-seven patients who underwent ACDF via the PEEK cage–plate fusion system were enrolled and subjected to ≥6 months of follow-up. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to different cage–plate implantation levels: 1-level group (n = 17), 2-level group (n = 24), 3-level group (n = 12), and 4-level group (n = 4). Fusion time, changes in segment and global lordotic angle, subsidence rate, and changes in disc and adjacent segmental disc height were subjected to radiological evaluation.The fusion period of multilevel ACDF was longer than that of single-level ACDF. The fusion period of the 3-level (4.09 ± 0.94, P = .004) and 4-level (5.25 ± 0.89, P = .004) group was also significantly longer than that of the 1-level group. The mean lordotic angle in all of the groups was changed in the immediate postoperative period and in the final follow-up. The cage subsidence rates were 11.76% (2/17) in the 1-level group, 20.83% (5/24) in the 2-level group, and 2/12 (16.67%) in the 3-level group. No subsidence occurred in the 4-level groups. Changes in the lower adjacent segmental disc height were significantly increased in multilevel ACDF compared with those in single-level ACDF.Despite the longer fusion time, the outcomes of the proposed system were even better with the greater number of treatment levels by using PEEK cage–plate fusion system. Changes in the lower adjacent segmental disc height should also prolong follow-up duration to investigate the symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration in multilevel ACDF.
机译:本研究旨在通过使用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼板融合系统比较单级和多级颈椎前路椎间盘摘除术和融合术(ACDF)在放射学结果和并发症方面的差异。57例经PEEK支架接受ACDF的患者加入了板融合系统并进行了≥6个月的随访。根据不同的笼板植入水平将患者分为4组:1级组(n = 17),2级组(n = 24),3级组(n = 12)和4级组(n = 4)。对融合时间,节段和整体前凸角的变化,下沉率以及椎间盘及邻近节段椎间盘高度的变化进行放射学评估。多级ACDF的融合期长于单级ACDF。 3级(4.09±0.94,P = 0.004)和4级(5.25±0.89,P = 0.004)组的融合期也明显长于1级组。所有组的平均脊柱前凸角度在术后即刻和最后的随访中均发生了改变。 1级组的网箱下陷率为11.76%(2/17),2级组的网箱下陷率为20.83%(5/24),3级组的网罩下陷率为2/12(16.67%)。在4级组中没有发生沉降。与单级ACDF相比,多级ACDF的下段节段椎间盘高度变化明显增加。尽管融合时间更长,但通过使用PEEK笼进行更多的治疗级别,所提出的系统的结果甚至更好。板融合系统。下相邻节段椎间盘高度的变化也应延长随访时间,以调查多级ACDF中有症状的相邻节段变性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号