首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Resident Perspective on Feedback and Barriers for Use as an Educational Tool
【2h】

Resident Perspective on Feedback and Barriers for Use as an Educational Tool

机译:居民对作为教育工具的反馈和障碍的看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundFeedback in physician graduate medical education is not clearly defined. Some parties may view questioning as a form of feedback, others the conversations over lunch, some the comments in the operating room (OR), and still others the written evaluation at planned meetings. The lack of clarity in defining what constitutes feedback is concerning when this is considered a fundamental means of education to enhance practices and care for patients. If residents do not recognize they are receiving feedback, or the response to feedback is met with opposition, then feedback as an educational device can be limited. For this manuscript, feedback is defined as written or verbal comments regarding medical knowledge, performance, technique, or patient care.ObjectiveThis study attempts to identify barriers to feedback by identifying attitudes toward feedback processes through a questionnaire.MethodsTen questions were provided to residents at a single institution representing, emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, neurology, and neurosurgery during the 2017-2018 academic year. Response was voluntary and the study was granted exemption by local institutional review board since no identifying information was collected to link responses to specific residents. Questions were formulated to identify how positive or negative a resident felt toward specific aspects of feedback.ResultsOf the possible 84 resident respondents, 40 residents participated reflecting a response of approximately 48%. Questionnaires revealed that 22.5% of respondents found feedback to be a stressful event. Sixty-seven point five percent (67.5%) of resident respondents associated the prompt that they are about to receive feedback as concerning. Only 2.5% of residents identified a meeting with the program director as a sign that the resident may be doing well. Appointments for feedback were viewed as a positive event in 12.5% of respondents. Ninety-five percent (95%) of residents do not feel that all feedback will affect their permanent record. Ten percent (10%) of residents identified receiving feedback as a positive event. Ninety-five percent (95%) of residents indicated that they have actively tried to change behavior or practices based on feedback. Forty percent (40%) of residents found themselves censoring “negative” feedback.ConclusionsBarriers to feedback include the inability to present sensitive subjects in a constructive manner and superficial relationships between the evaluator and resident physician. Research directed at addressing these barriers could lead to improved use of feedback as an educational tool.
机译:背景尚未明确定义医师研究生医学教育中的反馈。一些政党可能将提问视为反馈的一种形式,另一些政党则将其视为午餐时的对话,而在手术室(OR)中则有一些评论,还有一些政党将其视为计划会议的书面评估。何时定义反馈的构成缺乏清晰性,这关系到何时将其视为加强实践和对患者的护理的基本教育手段。如果居民不认识到他们正在接受反馈,或者对反馈的回应遭到反对,那么作为教育工具的反馈可能会受到限制。对于本手稿,反馈定义为有关医学知识,表现,技术或患者护理的书面或口头评论。目的本研究试图通过问卷调查确定对反馈过程的态度,从而确定反馈障碍。在2017-2018学年期间代表急诊医学,家庭医学,内科,神经病学和神经外科的单一机构。回答是自愿的,并且该研究被当地机构审查委员会授予豁免,因为未收集任何识别信息以将回答与特定居民联系起来。提出问题以识别居民对反馈的特定方面的积极或否定。结果在可能的84位居民中,有40位居民参与了调查,反映出大约48%的答复。问卷调查显示,有22.5%的受访者认为反馈是一个压力大的事件。 67%的受访者中有百分之五(67.5%)的回答与他们即将收到有关反馈的提示相关。只有2.5%的居民认为与计划负责人会面是居民表现良好的标志。接受反馈的受访者在12.5%的受访者中被视为积极事件。 95%(95%)的居民并不认为所有反馈都会影响他们的永久记录。百分之十(10%)的居民认为收到反馈是积极事件。 95%(95%)的居民表示他们已积极尝试根据反馈来改变行为或习惯。 40%(40%)的居民发现自己审查了“负面”反馈。结论反馈的障碍包括无法以建设性的方式展示敏感的受试者以及评估者与住院医师之间的肤浅关系。针对这些障碍的研究可能会导致更好地利用反馈作为一种教育工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号