首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Headache and Pain >Quality in the provision of headache care. 2: defining quality and its indicators
【2h】

Quality in the provision of headache care. 2: defining quality and its indicators

机译:提供头痛护理质量。 2:定义质量及其指标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study was to define “quality” of headache care, and develop indicators that are applicable in different settings and cultures and to all types of headache. No definition of quality of headache care has been formulated. Two sets of quality indicators, proposed in the US and UK, are limited to their localities and/or specific to migraine and their development received no input from people with headache. We first undertook a literature review. Then we conducted a series of focus-group consultations with key stakeholders (doctors, nurses and patients) in headache care. From the findings we proposed a large number of putative quality indicators, and refined these and reduced their number in consultations with larger international groups of stakeholder representatives. We formulated a definition of quality from the quality indicators. Five main themes were identified: (1) headache services; (2) health professionals; (3) patients; (4) financial resources; (5) political agenda and legislation. An initial list of 160 putative quality indicators in 14 domains was reduced to 30 indicators in 9 domains. These gave rise to the following multidimensional definition of quality of headache care: “Good-quality headache care achieves accurate diagnosis and individualized management, has appropriate referral pathways, educates patients about their headaches and their management, is convenient and comfortable, satisfies patients, is efficient and equitable, assesses outcomes and is safe.” Quality in headache care is multidimensional and resides in nine essential domains that are of equal importance. The indicators are currently being tested for feasibility of use in clinical settings.
机译:这项研究的目的是定义头痛护理的“质量”,并制定适用于不同背景和文化以及所有类型头痛的指标。尚未定义头痛护理质量的定义。美国和英国提出了两套质量指标,它们仅限于当地和/或偏头痛,并且其发展没有收到头痛患者的意见。我们首先进行了文献综述。然后,我们与头痛护理领域的主要利益相关者(医生,护士和患者)进行了一系列的焦点小组磋商。根据调查结果,我们提出了许多假定的质量指标,并与大型国际利益相关方代表小组进行了磋商,对这些指标进行了完善和减少。我们根据质量指标制定了质量定义。确定了五个主要主题:(1)头痛服务; (2)卫生专业人员; (3)患者; (四)财政资源; (5)政治议程和立法。最初的14个领域的160个推定质量指标清单已减少为9个领域的30个指标。这些就导致了头痛护理质量的以下多维定义:“优质的头痛护理可实现准确的诊断和个性化管理,具有适当的转诊途径,教育患者有关头痛的知识和管理方法,既方便又舒适,令患者满意,高效,公平,评估结果并且安全。”头痛护理的质量是多维的,并且位于同等重要的九个重要领域。目前正在测试这些指标在临床环境中使用的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号