首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Feasibility of a craniometry in a comminuted zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture
【2h】

Feasibility of a craniometry in a comminuted zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture

机译:颅骨粉碎性oma骨粉碎性骨折粉碎性骨折的可行性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Few studies have reported on using craniometry for comminuted zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture management. We present our experiences with this procedure and a review of the related literature.From September 2011 to October 2018, 43 patients with comminuted ZMC fracture receiving open reduction internal fixation under coronal incision were enrolled. Data on gender, age, operation time, hospital stay, duration of follow-up, vertical/horizontal differences, and complications were collected. Between-group differences (C-arm imaging vs craniometry) were evaluated using nonparametric Mann–Whitney test for continuous data and chi-square test for categorical data.No significant difference were found between the groups regarding gender, age, hospital duration, follow-up duration, and postoperative complications, except for operation time. The averaged operation time was significantly shorter in the C-arm imaging group (4.217 h) than in the craniometry group (6.193 h). The C-arm imaging group had two cases with horizontal differences >3 mm and one case with vertical differences >3 mm. The craniometry group had four cases with horizontal differences >3 mm and four cases with vertical differences >3 mm. There were no significant differences between the two groups in horizontal differences and vertical differences.Craniometry may achieve the same outcomes as C-arm imaging in comminuted ZMC fracture management; however, the former requires more time than the latter.
机译:很少有研究报道使用颅骨测量术治疗粉碎性oma骨-腋窝复合体(ZMC)骨折。我们介绍了该手术的经验并回顾了相关文献.2011年9月至2018年10月,我们纳入了43例ZMC粉碎性粉碎性骨折,在冠状切口下接受开放复位内固定的患者。收集有关性别,年龄,手术时间,住院时间,随访时间,垂直/水平差异和并发症的数据。组间差异(C臂成像与颅骨测量)使用非参数Mann-Whitney检验进行连续数据评估,卡方检验用于分类数据。两组之间在性别,年龄,住院时间,随访,持续时间和术后并发症(手术时间除外)。 C臂成像组的平均手术时间(4.217 h)明显比颅骨测量组的平均手术时间(6.193 h)短。 C型臂成像组有2例水平差> 3μmm,1例垂直差> 3μmm。颅骨测量组有4例水平差> 3mm的病例和4例垂直差> 3mm的病例。两组的水平和垂直差异均无显着性差异。颅骨造影在粉碎性ZMC骨折处理中的效果可能与C臂成像相同。但是,前者比后者需要更多的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号