首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Different influences on lexical priming for integrative thematic and taxonomic relations
【2h】

Different influences on lexical priming for integrative thematic and taxonomic relations

机译:集成主题和分类学关系对词汇启动的不同影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Word pairs may be integrative (i.e., combination of two concepts into one meaningful entity; e.g., fruit—cake), thematically related (i.e., connected in time and place; e.g., party—cake), and/or taxonomically related (i.e., shared features and category co-members; e.g., muffin—cake). Using participant ratings and computational measures, we demonstrated distinct patterns across measures of similarity and co-occurrence, and familiarity for each relational construct in two different item sets. In a standard lexical decision task (LDT) with various delays between prime and target presentation (SOAs), target RTs and priming magnitudes were consistent across the three relations for both item sets. However, across the SOAs, there were distinct patterns among the three relations on some of the underlying measures influencing target word recognition (LSA, Google, and BEAGLE). These distinct patterns suggest different mechanisms of lexical priming and further demonstrate that integrative relations are distinct from thematic and taxonomic relations.
机译:单词对可以是集成的(即,将两个概念组合成一个有意义的实体;例如,水果蛋糕),主题相关(即,在时间和地点上连接;例如,派对蛋糕)和/或分类相关(即,共享功能和类别的共同成员;例如,松饼蛋糕。使用参与者评分和计算量度,我们展示了跨相似度和共现度以及两个不同项目集中每个关系构造的熟悉度的不同模式。在标准词法决策任务(LDT)中,在主要提示和目标表示(SOA)之间存在各种延迟,在两个项目集的三个关系中,目标RT和主要提示幅度是一致的。但是,在整个SOA中,在影响目标词识别(LSA,Google和BEAGLE)的某些基础量度的三个关系之间,存在着截然不同的模式。这些不同的模式表明了词法启动的不同机制,并进一步证明了整合关系不同于主题和分类学关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号