首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Science >Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin
【2h】

Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin

机译:胱抑素和Bactobolin差异诱导B16黑色素瘤和EL-4淋巴瘤细胞凋亡。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Most solid tumor cells are less sensitive to apoptosis induced by anticancer drugs than hematopoietic cancer cells. However, the mechanisms of the different responses to apoptosis in these cell types remain unknown. To explore this question, we used B16 melanoma and EL‐4 lymphoma cells as solid tumor‐ and hematopoietic cancer‐derived cell lines, and examined the effects of two apoptosis inducers, cytostatin and bactobolin, on both cell lines. Apoptosis in B16 cells was induced strongly by bactobolin, but weakly by cytostatin. In contrast, apoptosis in EL‐4 cells was induced strongly by cytostatin, but weakly by bactobolin. While caspase‐3 was activated upon induction of apoptosis in both cell lines, Ac‐DEVD‐CHO, a specific inhibitor of caspase‐3, suppressed only the apoptosis in B16 cells. In B16 cells, cyclins E, A, and B1 were decreased by strongly apoptosis‐inducing bactobolin prior to apoptosis commitment, but cyclin E was not decreased by weakly apoptosis‐inducing cytostatin. On the other hand, in EL‐4 cells cyclins D1, E, A, and B1 were decreased by strongly apoptosis‐inducing cytostatin prior to apoptosis commitment, but neither cyclin A nor B1 was decreased by weakly apoptosis‐inducing bactobolin. These results indicate that the dependency of apoptosis induction on caspase activity is different between the two cell lines. Furthermore, there may be an inverse correlation between specific cyclins and apoptosis induction in the two cell lines.
机译:与造血癌细胞相比,大多数实体肿瘤细胞对抗癌药诱导的凋亡的敏感性较低。然而,这些细胞类型中对细胞凋亡的不同反应的机制仍然未知。为了探讨这个问题,我们将B16黑色素瘤和EL-4淋巴瘤细胞用作实体瘤和造血细胞癌衍生的细胞系,并研究了两种细胞凋亡诱导剂,细胞抑素和放线菌素对这两种细胞系的影响。 B16细胞的凋亡由放线菌素强烈诱导,而细胞抑素则弱。相比之下,细胞抑素强烈诱导EL-4细胞凋亡,而放线菌素则弱诱导凋亡。虽然两种细胞系均诱导凋亡激活了caspase-3,但caspase-3的特异性抑制剂Ac-DEVD-CHO仅抑制B16细胞的凋亡。在B16细胞中,在细胞凋亡之前,强烈诱导凋亡的Bactobolin可降低细胞周期蛋白E,A和B1的表达,而细胞凋亡抑制因子弱则不会降低cyclin E的表达。另一方面,在EL-4细胞中,在细胞凋亡前,细胞凋亡素D1,E,A和B1会被强烈的细胞凋亡抑制素降低,而细胞周期素A和B1却会由于细胞凋亡诱导的actobolin而降低。这些结果表明,两种细胞系之间凋亡诱导对胱天蛋白酶活性的依赖性不同。此外,在两种细胞系中特异性细胞周期蛋白与凋亡诱导之间可能存在负相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号