首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Volume assessment accuracy in computed tomography: a phantom study
【2h】

Volume assessment accuracy in computed tomography: a phantom study

机译:计算机断层扫描中体积评估的准确性:幻像研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is a broad push in the cancer imaging community to eventually replace linear tumor measurements with three‐dimensional evaluation of tumor volume. To evaluate the potential accuracy of volume measurement in tumors by CT, a gelatin phantom consisting of 55 polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spheres spanning diameters from 1.6 mm to 25.4 mm was fabricated and scanned using thin slice (0.625 mm) CT (GE LightSpeed 16). Nine different reconstruction combinations of field of view dimension (FOV = 20, 30, 40 cm) and CT kernel (standard, lung, bone) were analyzed. Contiguous thin‐slice images were averaged to produce CT images with greater thicknesses (1.25, 2.50, 5.0 mm). Simple grayscale thresholding techniques were used to segment the PMMA spheres from the gelatin background, where a total of 1800 spherical volumes were evaluated across the permutations studied. The geometric simplicity of the phantom established upper limits on measurement accuracy. In general, smaller slice thickness and larger sphere diameters produced more accurate volume assessment than larger slice thickness and smaller sphere diameter. The measured volumes were smaller than the actual volumes by a common factor depending on slice thickness; overall, 0.625 mm slices produced on average 18%, 1.25 mm slices produced 22%, 2.5 mm CT slices produced 29%, and 5.0 mm slices produced 39% underestimates of volume (mm3). Field of view did not have a significant effect on volume accuracy. Reconstruction algorithm significantly affected volume accuracy (p  0.0001), with the lung kernel having the smallest error, followed by the bone and standard kernels. The results of this investigation provide guidance for CT protocol development and may guide the development of more advanced techniques to promote quantitatively accurate CT volumetric analysis of tumors.PACS number: 87.57.Q‐
机译:癌症影像学界大力推动以肿瘤体积的三维评估最终取代线性肿瘤测量。为了评估通过CT在肿瘤中进行体积测量的潜在准确性,制造了由55个直径从1.6 mm至25.4 mm的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)球组成的明胶模型,并使用薄片(0.625 mm)CT(GE LightSpeed 16)进行了扫描。分析了9种不同的视场尺寸(FOV = 20、30、40 cm)和CT核(标准,肺,骨骼)的重建组合。对连续的薄层图像进行平均以生成厚度更大的CT图像(1.25、2.50、5.0 mm)。简单的灰度阈值技术被用于从明胶背景中分割出PMMA球体,在整个研究的排列中评估了1800个球体。体模的几何简单性为测量精度设定了上限。通常,与较大的切片厚度和较小的球体直径相比,较小的切片厚度和较大的球体直径可产生更准确的体积评估。根据切片的厚度,测得的体积比实际体积小一个公因子。总体而言,0.625毫米的切片平均产生18%,1.25毫米的切片产生22%,2.5毫米的CT切片产生29%,而5.0毫米的切片产生39%的体积低估(mm 3 )。视场对体积精度没有显着影响。重建算法极大地影响了体积精度(p <0.0001),其中肺仁误差最小,其次是骨骼仁和标准仁。这项研究的结果为CT方案的开发提供了指导,并可能指导更先进的技术的发展,以促进对肿瘤进行定量准确的CT容积分析.PACS编号:87.57。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号