首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Suggesting a new design for multileaf collimator leaves based on Monte Carlo simulation of two commercial systems
【2h】

Suggesting a new design for multileaf collimator leaves based on Monte Carlo simulation of two commercial systems

机译:根据两个商业系统的蒙特卡洛模拟提出一种多叶准直器叶片的新设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Due to intensive use of multileaf collimators (MLCs) in clinics, finding an optimum design for the leaves becomes essential. There are several studies which deal with comparison of MLC systems, but there is no article with a focus on offering an optimum design using accurate methods like Monte Carlo. In this study, we describe some characteristics of MLC systems including the leaf tip transmission, beam hardening, leakage radiation and penumbra width for Varian and Elekta 80‐leaf MLCs using MCNP4C code. The complex geometry of leaves in these two common MLC systems was simulated. It was assumed that all of the MLC systems were mounted on a Varian accelerator and with a similar thickness as Varian's and the same distance from the source. Considering the obtained results from Varian and Elekta leaf designs, an optimum design was suggested combining the advantages of three common MLC systems and the simulation results of this proposed one were compared with the Varian and the Elekta. The leakage from suggested design is 29.7% and 31.5% of the Varian and Elekta MLCs. In addition, other calculated parameters of the proposed MLC leaf design were better than those two commercial ones. Although it shows a wider penumbra in comparison with Varian and Elekta MLCs, taking into account the curved motion path of the leaves, providing a double focusing design will solve the problem. The suggested leaf design is a combination of advantages from three common vendors (Varian, Elekta and Siemens) which can show better results than each one. Using the results of this theoretical study may bring about superior practical outcomes.PACS number: 87.56.nk, 87.55.K, 87.56.N
机译:由于在临床中大量使用多叶准直器(MLC),因此,为叶片寻找最佳设计变得至关重要。有一些研究涉及MLC系统的比较,但是没有一篇文章着重介绍使用像Monte Carlo这样的精确方法来提供最佳设计的方法。在这项研究中,我们使用MCNP4C代码描述了Varian和Elekta 80叶MLC的MLC系统的一些特征,包括叶尖传输,束硬化,泄漏辐射和半影宽度。模拟了这两种常见的MLC系统中叶片的复杂几何形状。假定所有MLC系统都安装在Varian加速器上,并且厚度与Varian相似,并且距信号源的距离相同。考虑到从瓦里安(Varian)和埃莱克塔(Elekta)叶片设计获得的结果,结合三个常见MLC系统的优点,提出了一种优化设计,并将该提议的仿真结果与瓦里安(Varian)和埃莱克塔(Elekta)进行了比较。建议设计的泄漏量是Varian和Elekta MLC的29.7%和31.5%。此外,拟议的MLC叶片设计的其他计算参数优于这两个商业参数。尽管与Varian和Elekta MLC相比,它显示出更宽的半影,但考虑到叶子的弯曲运动路径,提供双重聚焦设计将解决该问题。建议的叶片设计结合了三个常见供应商(Varian,Elekta和Siemens)的优势,可以显示出比每个供应商更好的效果。利用这项理论研究的结果可能会带来更好的实际结果。PACS编号:87.56.nk,87.55.K,87.56.N

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号