首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Community Genetics >The promises of genomic screening: building a governance infrastructure. Special issue: genetics and democracy
【2h】

The promises of genomic screening: building a governance infrastructure. Special issue: genetics and democracy

机译:基因组筛选的前景:建立治理基础设施。特刊:遗传与民主

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

New screening possibilities become available at a high rate, both useful and unsound possibilities. All screening programmes do harm, and only few have more advantages than disadvantages at reasonable cost. Horizon scanning is needed to identify those few possibilities with more pros than cons. Attunement is needed between actors involved: scientists developing new high-throughput screening techniques and treatment, health care workers, patients and consumers and governmental agencies. The product of a process of attunement may be a quality mark as a norm for professional conduct, rather than legal measures, as the field is moving fast. As actors may have varying perspectives, a governance structure is needed to develop an agenda that is agreed upon by all or most actors involved. A standing committee might oversee the evaluation of benefits and disadvantages in an integrated approach, taking evidence, economics and ethics into account. A proactive role of governmental agencies is needed to facilitate agenda setting and attunement. Policy making has to be transparent and open to stakeholder engagement.
机译:高效率的新筛选可能性,包括有用的和不可靠的可能性。所有筛选程序都会造成危害,并且只有少数几个程序具有合理的成本,而弊大于利。需要进行水平扫描,以找出优点少于缺点的少数可能性。参与人员之间需要协调:开发新的高通量筛选技术和治疗方法的科学家,医护人员,患者和消费者以及政府机构。随着领域的快速发展,调解过程的产物可能是作为专业行为规范的质量标志,而非法律措施。由于行为者可能有不同的观点,因此需要一种治理结构来制定一项议程,该议程应得到所有或大多数参与者的同意。一个常任委员会可能会以综合的方式监督对利弊的评估,同时要考虑证据,经济学和伦理学。需要政府机构的积极作用来促进议程的制定和协调。政策制定必须透明并允许利益相关者参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号