首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Dosimetric advantages of O‐ring design radiotherapy system for skull‐base tumors
【2h】

Dosimetric advantages of O‐ring design radiotherapy system for skull‐base tumors

机译:O型环设计放射治疗系统对颅底肿瘤的剂量学优势

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a new O‐ring design radiotherapy delivery system has advantages in radiotherapy planning for skull‐base tumors. Twenty‐five patients with skull‐base tumors were included in this study. Two plans were made using conventional (Plan A) or new (Plan B) techniques. Plan A consisted of four dynamic conformal arcs (DCAs): two were horizontal, and the other two were from cranial directions. Plan B was created by converting horizontal arcs to those from caudal directions making use of the O‐ring design radiotherapy system. The micromultileaf collimators were fitted to cover at least 99% of the planning target volume with prescribed doses, 90% of the dose at the isocenter. The two plans were compared in terms of target homogeneity, conformity, and irradiated volume of normal tissues, using a two‐sided paired t‐test. For evaluation regarding target coverage, the homogeneity indices defined by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 83 were 0.099±0.010 (mean ± standard deviation) and 0.092±0.010, the conformity indices defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were 1.720±0.249 and 1.675±0.239, and the Paddick's conformity indices were 0.585±0.078 and 0.602±0.080, in Plans A and B, respectively. For evaluation of irradiated normal tissue, the Paddick's gradient indices were 3.118±0.283 and 2.938±0.263 in Plans A and B, respectively. All of these differences were statistically significant (p‐values <0.05). The mean doses of optic nerves, eyes, brainstem, and hippocampi were also significantly lower in Plan B. The DCA technique from caudal directions using the new O‐ring design radiotherapy system can improve target homogeneity and conformity compared with conventional DCA techniques, and can also decrease the volume of surrounding normal tissues that receives moderate doses.PACS numbers: 87.55.‐x, 87.55.D‐, 87.55.dk
机译:这项研究的目的是调查新的O形圈设计的放射治疗输送系统在颅底肿瘤的放射治疗计划中是否具有优势。本研究纳入了25例颅底肿瘤患者。使用常规(计划A)或新(计划B)技术制定了两个计划。计划A由四个动态共形弧(DCA)组成:两个是水平的,另外两个是从颅骨方向来的。计划B是通过使用O形环设计放射治疗系统将水平弧转换为来自尾方向的弧而创建的。安装了微叶准直仪,以规定的剂量覆盖计划目标体积的至少99%,等中心点的剂量为90%。使用双面配对t检验比较了两个计划的靶标均一性,一致性和正常组织的照射量。为了评估目标覆盖率,国际辐射单位和测量委员会83定义的均一性指标为 0.099 ± 0.010 (平均值±标准差)和 0.092 ± 0.010 ,放射治疗肿瘤学小组定义的合格指数为 1.720 ± 0.249 1.675 ± 0.239 ,并且Paddick的一致性索引为 0.585 ± 0.078 0.602 ± 0.080 ,分别在计划A和B中。为了评估受辐照的正常组织,帕迪克氏梯度指数为 3.118 ± 0.283 2.938 ± 0.263 , 分别。所有这些差异在统计上都是显着的(p值 < mo> / mo> 0.05 )。在Plan B中,视神经,眼睛,脑干和海马的平均剂量也显着降低。与传统的DCA技术相比,使用新的O形环设计放射治疗系统从尾端开始的DCA技术可以改善靶标的均质性和顺应性。也会减少接受中等剂量的周围正常组织的体积.PACS编号:87.55.-x,87.55.D-,87.55.dk

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号