首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ambio >Carcass Provisioning to Support Scavengers: Evaluating a Controversial Nature Conservation Practice
【2h】

Carcass Provisioning to Support Scavengers: Evaluating a Controversial Nature Conservation Practice

机译:尸体供应以支持清道夫:评估有争议的自然保护实践

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A number of scavenger species have suffered population declines across Europe. In attempts to reverse their decline, some land and wildlife managers have adopted the practice of leaving or placing out carcasses of wild or domestic herbivores to provide a source of carrion. However, this can be a controversial practice, with as yet unclear outcomes for many target species and the ecosystems they are part of. Here we bring out the key aspects of this increasingly common conservation practice illustrated using three contrasting cases studies. We show that the provision of carcasses is often motivated by a desire to benefit charismatic species or to facilitate nutrient cycling throughout an ecosystem. Evidence for the effectiveness of this practice in achieving these objectives, however, is mostly lacking, with ecologists studying “easier” species groups such as beetles and therefore not providing relevant insights. Moreover, conflicts between environmental policies that carcass provisioning is aimed at and other social and economic objectives do occur but these projects are often designed without taking into account this broader context. We conclude that expecting carcasses to simply be “good for biodiversity” may be too naïve a view. A greater knowledge of the impact of carcass provisioning and placement on ecosystems and society at large is required before it can become a more effective conservation tool at a wider scale.
机译:在欧洲,许多清道夫物种的种群数量减少。为了扭转其下降的趋势,一些土地和野生动植物管理者采取了留下或放下野生或家畜食草动物尸体的做法,以提供腐肉源。但是,这可能是一个有争议的做法,对于许多目标物种及其所属的生态系统而言,目前尚不清楚结果。在这里,我们通过三个对比案例研究,阐述了这种日益普遍的保护实践的关键方面。我们表明,尸体的提供通常是受惠于具有超凡魅力的物种或促进整个生态系统中养分循环的愿望所驱动。然而,由于生态学家研究了诸如甲虫之类的“更容易”的物种,因此没有提供相关的见识,因此,这种实践在实现这些目标方面的有效性的证据大多缺乏。此外,屠体供应的目标环境政策与其他社会和经济目标之间确实发生了冲突,但是这些项目的设计常常没有考虑到更广泛的背景。我们得出的结论是,仅仅期望尸体“有益于生物多样性”可能就太幼稚了。在使car体供应和放置对生态系统和整个社会的影响之前,需要有更多的知识,才能使cas体成为更广泛的更有效的保护工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号