首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Medicine >Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening
【2h】

Risk of breast cancer after false‐positive results in mammographic screening

机译:乳房X光检查中假阳性结果后患乳腺癌的风险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Women with false‐positive results are commonly referred back to routine screening. Questions remain regarding their long‐term outcome of breast cancer. We assessed the risk of screen‐detected breast cancer in women with false‐positive results. We conducted a joint analysis using individual level data from the population‐based screening programs in Copenhagen and Funen in Denmark, Norway, and Spain. Overall, 150,383 screened women from Denmark (1991–2008), 612,138 from Norway (1996–2010), and 1,172,572 from Spain (1990–2006) were included. Poisson regression was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of screen‐detected cancer for women with false‐positive versus negative results. We analyzed information from 1,935,093 women 50–69 years who underwent 6,094,515 screening exams. During an average 5.8 years of follow‐up, 230,609 (11.9%) women received a false‐positive result and 27,849 (1.4%) were diagnosed with screen‐detected cancer. The adjusted RR of screen‐detected cancer after a false‐positive result was 2.01 (95% CI: 1.93–2.09). Women who tested false‐positive at first screen had a RR of 1.86 (95% CI: 1.77–1.96), whereas those who tested false‐positive at third screening had a RR of 2.42 (95% CI: 2.21–2.64). The RR of breast cancer at the screening test after the false‐positive result was 3.95 (95% CI: 3.71–4.21), whereas it decreased to 1.25 (95% CI: 1.17–1.34) three or more screens after the false‐positive result. Women with false‐positive results had a twofold risk of screen‐detected breast cancer compared to women with negative tests. The risk remained significantly higher three or more screens after the false‐positive result. The increased risk should be considered when discussing stratified screening strategies.
机译:结果为假阳性的女性通常被转回常规筛查。关于它们对乳腺癌的长期结果仍然存在疑问。我们评估了具有假阳性结果的女性筛查乳腺癌的风险。我们使用了来自哥本哈根,丹麦,挪威和西班牙的Funen的基于人口的筛查计划的个人水平数据进行了联合分析。总共包括来自丹麦(1991-2008年)的150383名筛查妇女,来自挪威(1996-2010年)的612138人和来自西班牙(1990-2006年)的1172572人。 Poisson回归用于估计假阳性和阴性结果的女性筛查癌症的相对风险(RR)。我们分析了1,935,093名50-69岁妇女的信息,这些妇女接受了6,094,515项筛查检查。在平均5.8年的随访期间,230,609(11.9%)名妇女得到了假阳性结果,有27,849名(1.4%)被诊断出患有筛查出的癌症。假阳性结果后筛查的癌症校正后的RR为2.01(95%CI:1.93–2.09)。第一次筛查为假阳性的妇女的RR为1.86(95%CI:1.77–1.96),而第三次筛查为假阳性的妇女的RR为2.42(95%CI:2.21–2.64)。假阳性结果后筛查测试的乳腺癌RR为3.95(95%CI:3.71–4.21),而假阳性后三或更多次筛查,其RR下降至1.25(95%CI:1.17–1.34)。结果。与检查结果阴性的女性相比,结果为假阳性的女性患乳腺癌的风险是筛查女性的两倍。假阳性结果后,进行三个或更多次筛查的风险仍然很高。在讨论分层筛查策略时应考虑增加的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号