首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Radiation Research >The usefulness of an independent patient-specific treatment planning verification method using a benchmark plan in high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix
【2h】

The usefulness of an independent patient-specific treatment planning verification method using a benchmark plan in high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix

机译:使用基准计划的独立患者特异性治疗计划验证方法在大剂量率子宫颈腔内近距离治疗中的有用性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To develop an easy independent patient-specific quality assurance (QA) method using a benchmark plan for high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervix cancer, we conducted benchmark treatment planning with various sizes and combinations of tandem-ovoid and tandem-cylinder applications with ‘ideal’ geometry outside the patient. Two-dimensional-based treatment planning was conducted based on the Manchester method. We predicted the total dwell time of individual treatment plans from the air kerma strength, total dwell time and prescription dose of the benchmark plan. In addition, we recorded the height (dh), width (dw) and thickness (dt) covered with 100% isodose line. These parameters were compared with 169 and 29 clinical cases for tandem-ovoid or tandem-cylinder cases, respectively. With regard to tandem-ovoid cases, differences in total dwell time, dh, dt and dw between benchmark and individual plans were on average –0.2% ± 3.8%, –1.0 mm ± 2.6 mm, 0.8 mm ± 1.3 mm and –0.1 mm ± 1.5 mm, respectively. With regard to tandem-cylinder cases, differences in total dwell time, dhfront (the distance from tandem tip to tandem ring), dt and dw between benchmark and individual plans were on average –1.5% ± 3.1%, –1.5 mm ± 4.9 mm, 0.1 mm ± 1.0 mm and 0.2 mm ± 0.8 mm, respectively. Of two cases, more than 13% differences in total dwell time were observed between benchmark plans and the clinical cases, which turned out to be due to the use of the wrong source position setting. These results suggest that our method is easy and useful for independent verification of patient-specific treatment planning QA.
机译:为了使用宫颈癌高剂量率腔内近距离放射治疗的基准计划开发一种简便,独立的针对患者的质量保证(QA)方法,我们进行了基准治疗计划,该计划针对各种尺寸以及串联卵形和串联圆柱体应用以及患者体外的“理想”几何形状。基于曼彻斯特方法进行基于二维的治疗计划。我们从空气比释动能强度,总停留时间和基准计划的处方剂量预测了各个治疗计划的总停留时间。此外,我们记录了用100%等剂量线覆盖的高度(dh),宽度(dw)和厚度(dt)。将这些参数分别与169例和29例串联卵形或串联圆柱体病例进行比较。对于避免串联的情况,基准计划与单个计划之间的总停留时间,dh,dt和dw的平均差异平均为-0.2%±3.8%,-1.0mm±2.6mm,0.8mm±1.3mm和-0.1mm分别为±1.5毫米。关于双缸案例,基准计划和个人计划之间的总停留时间,dhfront(从双列针尖到双指环的距离),dt和dw的差异平均为-1.5%±3.1%,-1.5mm±4.9mm分别为0.1毫米±1.0毫米和0.2毫米±0.8毫米。在两个案例中,基准计划与临床案例之间的总停留时间差异超过13%,这是由于使用了错误的源位置设置造成的。这些结果表明,我们的方法对于针对特定患者的治疗计划QA的独立验证而言既简便又有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号