首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Medicine >A cross‐sectional study comparing a blood test for methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 tumor‐derived DNA with CEA for detection of recurrent colorectal cancer
【2h】

A cross‐sectional study comparing a blood test for methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 tumor‐derived DNA with CEA for detection of recurrent colorectal cancer

机译:一项横断面研究比较了甲基化BCAT1和IKZF1肿瘤来源的DNA与CEA的血液测试以检测复发性结直肠癌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recurrence will develop in 30–50% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases despite apparent clearance following treatment. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the only guideline‐recommended blood test for monitoring cases for recurrence, but its sensitivity and specificity are suboptimal. This observational study compared a novel 2‐gene (methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 DNA) blood test with CEA for detection of recurrent CRC. We conducted a paired comparison of the BCAT1/IKZF1 test with CEA (cut‐off 5 ng/mL) in blood from patients in remission after treatment for primary CRC and undergoing surveillance. Blood collected in the 12 months prior to or 3 months after complete investigational assessment of recurrence status were assayed and the results compared by McNemar's test. Of 397 patients enrolled, 220 underwent satisfactory assessment for recurrence and 122 had blood testing performed within the prescribed period. In 28 cases with recurrent CRC, CEA was positive in 9 (32%; 95% CI 16–52%) compared to 19 (68%; 95% CI 48–84%) positive for methylated style="fixed-case">BCAT1/ style="fixed-case">IKZF1 (P = 0.002). All samples that were style="fixed-case">CEA positive were also style="fixed-case">BCAT1/ style="fixed-case">IKZF1 positive. In 94 patients without clinically detectable recurrence, style="fixed-case">CEA was positive in 6 (6%, 95% style="fixed-case">CI 2–13%) and style="fixed-case">BCAT1/ style="fixed-case">IKZF1 in 12 (13%, 95% style="fixed-case">CI 7–21%), P = 0.210. The odds ratio of a positive style="fixed-case">CEA test for recurrence was 6.9 (95% style="fixed-case">CI 2–22) compared to 14.4 (5–39) for style="fixed-case">BCAT1/ style="fixed-case">IKZF1. The style="fixed-case">BCAT1/ style="fixed-case">IKZF1 test was more sensitive for recurrence than style="fixed-case">CEA and the odds of recurrence given a positive test was twice that of style="fixed-case">CEA. The style="fixed-case">BCAT1/ style="fixed-case">IKZF1 test should be further considered for monitoring cases for recurrence.
机译:尽管经过治疗明显清除,但仍有30%至50%的结直肠癌(CRC)病例复发。癌胚抗原(CEA)是唯一用于监测复发病例的指南推荐血液测试,但其敏感性和特异性欠佳。这项观察性研究将新型2基因(甲基化的BCAT1和IKZF1 DNA)血液测试与CEA进行了比较,以检测复发性CRC。我们对BCAT1 / IKZF1检测与CEA(临界值5 ng / mL)的配对进行了比较,这些患者的原发性CRC治疗后进行了监测并接受了监测,其缓解后的患者血液中。在对复发状况进行彻底调查评估之前的12个月或之后的3个月中,对采集的血液进行了分析,并通过McNemar检验比较了结果。在397名患者中,有220名接受了满意的复发评估,有122名在规定时间内进行了血液检查。在28例复发性CRC病例中,CEA阳性9例(32%; 95%CI 16-52%),而甲基化 style =“ fixed-case “> BCAT 1 / style =” fixed-case“> IKZF 1(P = 0.002)。所有 style =“ fixed-case”> CEA 阳性的样本也是 style =“ fixed-case”> BCAT 1 / style =“ fixed-case”> IKZF 1肯定。在94例没有临床可检测到复发的患者中, style =“ fixed-case”> CEA 在6例中为阳性(6%,95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI 2– 13%)和 style =“ fixed-case”> BCAT 1 / style =“ fixed-case”> IKZF 1 in 12(13%,95% style =“固定格式“> CI 7–21%),P = 0.210。阳性的 style =“ fixed-case”> CEA 复发测试的优势比为6.9(95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI 2–22),对于 style =“ fixed-case”> BCAT 1 / style =“ fixed-case”> IKZF 1,为14.4(5–39)。 style =“ fixed-case”> BCAT 1 / style =“ fixed-case”> IKZF 1测试对复发的敏感性比 style =“ fixed-case” > CEA ,阳性测试的复发几率是 style =“ fixed-case”> CEA 的两倍。应该进一步考虑使用 style =“ fixed-case”> BCAT 1 / style =“ fixed-case”> IKZF 1测试来监视病例的复发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号