首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Radiation Research >Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer
【2h】

Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

机译:同时进行放化疗与加速超分割放疗在局部晚期头颈部癌中的随机III期试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs accelerated hyperfractionation with concomitant boost (CCB) as a primary treatment for patients with Stage III–IV squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). A total of 85 non-metastatic advanced SCCHN patients were accrued from January 2003 to December 2007. Of these, 48 and 37 patients received CCRT and CCB, respectively. The patients were randomized to receive either three cycles of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil plus conventional radiotherapy (CCRT, 66 Gy in 6.5 weeks) or hybrid accelerated radiotherapy (CCB, 70 Gy in 6 weeks). The primary endpoint was determined by locoregional control rate. The secondary endpoints were overall survival and toxicity. With a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 3–102), the 5-year locoregional control rate was 69.6% in the CCRT arm vs 55.0% in the CCB arm (P = 0.184). The 5-year overall survival rate was marginally significantly different (P = 0.05): 76.1% in the CCRT arm vs 63.5% in the CCB arm. Radiotherapy treatment interruptions of more than three days were 60.4% and 40.5% in the CCRT arm and CCB arm, respectively. The median total treatment time was 55.5 days in the CCRT arm and 49 days in the CCB arm. The rate of Grade 3–4 acute mucositis was significantly higher in the CCB arm (67.6% vs 41.7%, P = 0.01), but no high grade hematologic toxicities were found in the CCB arm (27.2% vs 0%). CCRT has shown a trend of improving outcome over CCB irradiation in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较同时放化疗(CCRT)与加速超分割联合伴随加强疗法(CCB)作为III-IV期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)患者的主要治疗方法的有效性和安全性。从2003年1月至2007年12月,共收集了85例非转移性晚期SCCHN患者。其中,分别有48例和37例接受了CCRT和CCB治疗。患者被随机分为三个周期接受卡铂和5-氟尿嘧啶加常规放疗(CCRT,6.5周内66 Gy)或混合加速放疗(CCB,6周内70 Gy)。主要终点由局部控制率确定。次要终点是总生存期和毒性。中位随访43个月(范围3–102),CCRT组的5年局部区域控制率为69.6%,而CCB组为55.0%(P = 0.184)。 5年总生存率有显着差异(P = 0.05):CCRT组为76.1%,而CCB组为63.5%。 CCRT组和CCB组三天以上的放疗中断分别为60.4%和40.5%。 CCRT组的中位总治疗时间为55.5天,CCB组的中位总治疗时间为49天。 CCB组的3-4级急性粘膜炎发生率显着更高(67.6%比41.7%,P = 0.01),但CCB组没有发现高级别的血液学毒性(27.2%比0%)。在局部晚期头颈癌中,CCRT已显示出比CCB辐射改善结果的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号