首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Tree growth traits and social status affect the wood density of pioneer species in secondary subtropical forest
【2h】

Tree growth traits and social status affect the wood density of pioneer species in secondary subtropical forest

机译:树木的生长特性和社会地位影响次生亚热带森林先锋物种的木材密度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Wood density (WD) is not only an important parameter to estimate aboveground biomass but also an indicator of timber quality and plant adaptation strategies to stressful conditions (i.e., windthrow, pests, and pathogens). This study had three objectives: (1) to compare WD among seven subtropical tree species; (2) to determine how tree growth traits may influence possible differences in WD between the pioneer and shade‐tolerant species; and (3) to examine whether or not WD differs by tree social status (dominant vs. suppressed trees) within species. To do this, 70 trees were destructively harvested. From each tree, disks at different stem heights were obtained and subjected to a method of stem analysis to measure whole tree level WD. The results showed that WD differed significantly among the seven species (p < .001). Their average WD was 0.537 g/cm3, ranging from 0.409 g/cm3 for Choerospondias axillaris to 0.691 g/cm3 for Cyclobalanopsis glauca. The average WD of the four pioneer species (0.497 ± 0.13 g/cm3) was significantly lower (p < .01) than that of the three shade‐tolerant species (0.589 ± 0.12 g/cm3). The WD of the pioneers had a significant positive correlation with their stem diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (H), and tree age, but WD had a significant negative correlation with relative growth rate (RGR). In contrast, the WD of the shade‐tolerant tree species had no significant relationships with DBH, H, tree age, or RGR. The dominant trees of the pioneer species had a higher WD than the suppressed trees, whereas the shade‐tolerant species had a lower style="fixed-case">WD for dominant trees than the suppressed trees. However, the differences in style="fixed-case">WD between dominant and suppressed trees were not significant. Taken together, the results suggest that classifying species into pioneer and shade‐tolerant groups to examine the effects of tree growth traits and social status could improve our understanding of intra‐ and interspecific variation in style="fixed-case">WD among subtropical tree species.
机译:木材密度(WD)不仅是估算地上生物量的重要参数,而且还是木材质量和植物对压力条件(即风灾,害虫和病原体)适应策略的指标。这项研究具有三个目标:(1)比较7种亚热带树种中的WD。 (2)确定树木的生长特性如何影响先驱物种和耐荫物种之间WD的可能差异; (3)检查WD是否因物种内的树木社会地位(优势树和受抑制树)而不同。为此,破坏性地采伐了70棵树。从每棵树上获得不同茎高的圆盘,然后进行茎分析方法以测量整棵树的水平WD。结果表明,七个物种之间的WD差异显着(p <.001)。它们的平均WD为0.537 g / cm 3 ,范围从酸枣(Cerospondias axillaris)的0.409g / cm 3 到青冈青冈的0.691g / cm 3 。四个先锋物种的平均WD(0.497±0.13 g / cm 3 )显着低于三个耐荫物种(0.589±0.12 g / cm 3 )(p <.01) sup> 3 )。先驱者的WD与胸径(DBH),树高(H)和树木年龄的茎直径显着正相关,但WD与相对生长率(RGR)显着负相关。相反,耐荫树种的WD与DBH,H,树龄或RGR没有显着关系。先锋树种的优势树的WD高于抑制树,而耐荫树种的优势树的 style =“ fixed-case”> WD 低于抑制树。但是,优势树和抑制树之间的 style =“ fixed-case”> WD 差异并不显着。两者合计,结果表明将物种分为先锋和耐荫组以研究树木生长特征和社会地位的影响可以增进我们对 style =“ fixed-case”> WD < / span>在亚热带树种中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号