首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Physiological Reports >Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction
【2h】

Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction

机译:休闲跑步者的非连续和连续耐力训练方案之间的生理差异和代谢需求预测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated the physiological difference in recreational runners between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol. It also aimed to determine physiological surrogate that could monitor metabolic demand of prolonged running in real‐time. For data collection, a total of 18 active male recreational runners were recruited. Physiological (HR, RR, RER, ṼO2, BLa), and overall perceptual (RPEO) responses were recorded against three designed test sessions. Session 1 included ṼO2submax test to determine critical speed (CS) at anaerobic threshold (AT). Session 2 was the noncontinuous CS test until exhaustion, having 4:1 min work‐to‐rest ratio at CS, whereas session 3 was the continuous CS test till exhaustion. As 1‐min recovery during session 2 may change fatigue behavior, it was hypothesized that it will significantly change the physiological stress and hence endurance outcomes. Results reported average time to exhaustion (TTE) was 37.33(9.8) mins for session 2 and 23.28(9.87) mins for session 3. Participants experienced relatively higher metabolic demand (BLa) 6.78(1.43) mmol.l−1 in session 3 as compared to session 2 (5.52(0.93) mmol.l−1). RER was observed to increase in session 3 and decrease in session 2. Student's paired t‐test only reported a significant difference in TTE, ṼO2, RER, RPEO, and style="fixed-case">BLa at “End” between session 2 and 3. Reported difference in style="fixed-case">RPEO and % style="fixed-case">HR max at “ style="fixed-case">AT” were 5 (2.2) and 89.8 (2.60)% during session 2 and 6 (2.5) and 89.8 (2.59)% during session 3, respectively. Regression analysis reported strong correlation of % style="fixed-case">HR max (adj. R‐square = 0.588) with style="fixed-case">BLa than style="fixed-case">RPEO (adj. R‐square = 0.541). The summary of findings suggests that decreasing style="fixed-case">RER increased style="fixed-case">TTE and reduced style="fixed-case">BLa toward “End” during session 2 which might have helped to have better endurance. The % style="fixed-case">HR max was identified to be used as a better noninvasive surrogate of endurance intensity estimator.
机译:这项研究调查了不连续和连续耐力训练方案之间的休闲跑步运动员的生理差异。它还旨在确定可以实时监测长时间跑步的代谢需求的生理替代指标。为了收集数据,总共招募了18名活跃的男性休闲跑步者。针对三个设计的测试会议记录了生理(HR,RR,RER,O2,BLa)和总体知觉(RPEO)响应。第1节包括ṼO2submax测试,以确定无氧阈值(AT)的临界速度(CS)。第2节是直到疲惫的非连续CS测试,CS时的工作与休息比率为4:1,而第3节是直到疲惫的连续CS测试。由于第2阶段的1分钟恢复可能会改变疲劳行为,因此有可能会显着改变生理压力,从而改变耐力结果。结果报告说,第2阶段的平均疲惫时间(TTE)为37.33(9.8)分钟,第3阶段为23.28(9.87)分钟。参与者经历了相对较高的代谢需求(BLa)6.78(1.43)mmol.l <与会话2(5.52(0.93)mmol.l -1 )相比,会话3中的/ sup>。在第3节中观察到RER增加,第2节中减少。学生的配对t检验仅报告了TTE,ṼO2,RER,RPEO和 style =“ fixed-case”> BL a有显着差异在会话2和3之间的“结束”位置。报告的 style =“ fixed-case”> RPEO 和% style =“ fixed-case”> HR 最大值在“ 在第2届会议期间分别占5(2.2)和89.8(2.60)%,在第3届会议期间分别为6(2.5)和89.8(2.59)%。回归分析显示% style =“ fixed-case”> HR max(adj。R-square = 0.588)与 style =“ fixed-case”> BL a比 style =“ fixed-case”> RPEO (调整R平方= 0.541)。研究结果摘要表明,降低 style =“ fixed-case”> RER 会增加 style =“ fixed-case”> TTE 并降低 style =“ fixed-case”> BL a在第2阶段朝“结束”迈进,这可能有助于提高耐力。确定了% style =“ fixed-case”> HR max可作为耐力强度估计值的更好的非侵入性替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号