首页> 外文期刊>Physiological Reports >Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction
【24h】

Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction

机译:休闲跑步者非连续和连续耐力训练方案之间的生理差异与代谢需求预测

获取原文
           

摘要

This study investigated the physiological difference in recreational runners between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol. It also aimed to determine physiological surrogate that could monitor metabolic demand of prolonged running in real?¢????time. For data collection, a total of 18 active male recreational runners were recruited. Physiological (HR, RR, RER, ???1?? O 2 , BLa), and overall perceptual (RPE O ) responses were recorded against three designed test sessions. Session 1 included ???1?? O 2submax test to determine critical speed (CS) at anaerobic threshold (AT). Session 2 was the noncontinuous CS test until exhaustion, having 4:1????min work?¢????to?¢????rest ratio at CS, whereas session 3 was the continuous CS test till exhaustion. As 1?¢????min recovery during session 2 may change fatigue behavior, it was hypothesized that it will significantly change the physiological stress and hence endurance outcomes. Results reported average time to exhaustion (TTE) was 37.33(9.8) mins for session 2 and 23.28(9.87) mins for session 3. Participants experienced relatively higher metabolic demand (BLa) 6.78(1.43) mmol.l ?¢????1 in session 3 as compared to session 2 (5.52(0.93) mmol.l ?¢????1 ). RER was observed to increase in session 3 and decrease in session 2. Student's paired t ?¢????test only reported a significant difference in TTE, ???1??O 2 , RER, RPE O , and BLa at ?¢????End?¢???? between session 2 and 3. Reported difference in RPE O and %HR max at ?¢????AT?¢???? were 5 (2.2) and 89.8 (2.60)% during session 2 and 6 (2.5) and 89.8 (2.59)% during session 3, respectively. Regression analysis reported strong correlation of %HR max (adj. R?¢????square????=????0.588) with BLa than RPE O (adj. R?¢????square????=????0.541). The summary of findings suggests that decreasing RER increased TTE and reduced BLa toward ?¢????End?¢???? during session 2 which might have helped to have better endurance. The %HR max was identified to be used as a better noninvasive surrogate of endurance intensity estimator.
机译:这项研究调查了不连续和连续耐力训练方案之间的休闲跑步运动员的生理差异。它还旨在确定可以实时监测长时间跑步的代谢需求的生理替代指标。为了收集数据,总共招募了18名活跃的男性休闲跑步者。针对三个设计的测试阶段,记录了生理反应(HR,RR,RER,1?O 2,BLa)和总体知觉(RPE O)响应。第1课包含??? 1 ?? O 2submax测试,以确定无氧阈值(AT)的临界速度(CS)。第二节是直到疲惫的不连续CS测试,最小工作量为4:1的CS与静息比,而第三节是直到疲惫的连续CS测试。由于在第2节中的1分钟恢复可能会改变疲劳行为,因此假设它会显着改变生理压力并因此改变耐力结果。结果报告的第2课平均疲惫时间(TTE)为37.33(9.8)分钟,第3课为23.28(9.87)分钟。参与者的代谢需求(BLa)相对较高,为6.78(1.43)mmol.l。在会话3中为1,而在会话2中为5.52(0.93)mmol.l(1)。在第3节中观察到RER增加,第2节中减少。学生的配对t ¢检验仅报告TTE,1?O 2,RER,RPE O和BLa的显着差异。 End ????结束?¢ ????在会话2和3之间进行比较。会议2分别为5(2.2)和89.8(2.60)%,会议3为6(2.5)和89.8(2.59)%。回归分析表明,%HR max(ad R.平方?= 0.588)与BLa比RPE O(ad R.平方?= 0.588)有很强的相关性。 ?= ??? 0.541)。研究结果的总结表明,RER的降低会增加TTE并降低BLa,从而趋向于“结束”。在第2节中,这可能有助于提高耐力。已确定%HR max可以用作耐力强度估计值的更好无创替代指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号