首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences >Evaluating the effectiveness of intensive versus non‐intensive image interpretation education for radiographers: a randomised control trial study protocol
【2h】

Evaluating the effectiveness of intensive versus non‐intensive image interpretation education for radiographers: a randomised control trial study protocol

机译:评估射线照相技师强化和非强化图像解释教育的有效性:随机对照试验研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Radiographer commenting systems have not been successfully implemented in many Australian hospitals, despite evidence of their benefit and adoption elsewhere, such as the United Kingdom. An important contributor to the lack of widespread adoption of radiographer commenting in Australia (and likely elsewhere) is the limited availability of accessible education options for radiographers. The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of the same image interpretation education program delivered over an intensive 2‐day period (intensive format) versus a series of shorter regular workshops (non‐intensive format). The study design is a multicentre, stratified (by years of experience) two group parallel‐arm single‐blind (assessor blinded) randomised controlled trial. Participants will be allocated to one of the two groups: (1) intensive format of education or (2) non‐intensive format of education in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will undergo assessments before education, at 1 week post‐intervention completion and at 12 weeks post‐intervention completion. Findings from this trial will be of relevance to radiographers seeking image interpretation training as well as organisations providing image interpretation education to prepare clinical staff for participation in a radiographer commenting system. A limitation of the trial is that the sample will be inclusive of radiographers, and findings may not be able to be directly extrapolated to other clinical disciplines (e.g. junior doctors, physiotherapists or nurse practitioners).
机译:尽管有证据表明放射线照相师的评论系统在其他地方(例如英国)受益并被采用,但尚未在许多澳大利亚医院成功实施。造成澳大利亚(以及其他地区)放射技师评论缺乏广泛采用的一个重要原因是放射技师可获得的教育选择有限。这项随机对照试验的目的是比较在为期2天的密集课程(强化形式)和一系列较短的常规研讨会(非强化形式)下实施的相同图像解释教育计划的有效性。该研究设计是一项多中心,分层(按年经验)的两组平行单臂单盲(评估者盲)随机对照试验。参与者将被分配到以下两组之一:(1)强化教育形式或(2)非强化教育形式,比例为1:1。参加者将在接受教育之前,干预结束后1周和干预结束后12周接受评估。该试验的发现将与寻求影像解释培训的放射线照相师以及提供影像解释教育以准备临床人员参加放射线照相师评论系统的组织有关。该试验的局限性在于该样品将包括放射线照相师,并且研究结果可能无法直接推断到其他临床学科(例如初级医生,物理治疗师或执业护士)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号