首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty
【2h】

Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty

机译:肺部治疗计划中的稳健优化解决了几何不确定性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Robust optimization generates scenario‐based plans by a minimax optimization method to find optimal scenario for the trade‐off between target coverage robustness and organ‐at‐risk (OAR) sparing. In this study, 20 lung cancer patients with tumors located at various anatomical regions within the lungs were selected and robust optimization photon treatment plans including intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. The plan robustness was analyzed using perturbed doses with setup error boundary of ±3 mm in anterior/posterior (AP), ±3 mm in left/right (LR), and ±5 mm in inferior/superior (IS) directions from isocenter. Perturbed doses for D99, D98, and D95 were computed from six shifted isocenter plans to evaluate plan robustness. Dosimetric study was performed to compare the internal target volume‐based robust optimization plans (ITV‐IMRT and ITV‐VMAT) and conventional PTV margin‐based plans (PTV‐IMRT and PTV‐VMAT). The dosimetric comparison parameters were: ITV target mean dose (Dmean), R95(D95/Dprescription), Paddick's conformity index ( style="fixed-case">CI), homogeneity index ( style="fixed-case">HI), monitor unit ( style="fixed-case">MU), and style="fixed-case">OAR doses including lung (Dmean, V20 Gy and V15 Gy), chest wall, heart, esophagus, and maximum cord doses. A comparison of optimization results showed the robust optimization plan had better style="fixed-case">ITV dose coverage, better style="fixed-case">CI, worse style="fixed-case">HI, and lower style="fixed-case">OAR doses than conventional style="fixed-case">PTV margin‐based plans. Plan robustness evaluation showed that the perturbed doses of D99, D98, and D95 were all satisfied at least 99% of the style="fixed-case">ITV to received 95% of prescription doses. It was also observed that style="fixed-case">PTV margin‐based plans had higher style="fixed-case">MU than robust optimization plans. The results also showed robust optimization can generate plans that offer increased style="fixed-case">OAR sparing, especially for normal lungs and style="fixed-case">OARs near or abutting the target. Weak correlation was found between normal lung dose and target size, and no other correlation was observed in this study.
机译:稳健的优化通过最小最大优化方法生成基于方案的计划,以找到最佳方案,以在目标覆盖范围稳健性和风险机构(OAR)保留之间进行权衡。在这项研究中,选择了20名肺癌患者,这些患者的肿瘤位于肺部的各个解剖区域,并生成了包括强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)和体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)计划在内的强大的优化光子治疗计划。使用扰动剂量分析计划的稳健性,其等距点的前/后(AP)误差±3 mm,左/右(LR)误差±3 mm,下/上(IS)方向误差±5 mm。 D99,D98和D95的扰动剂量是根据六个偏移的等中心图计算得出的,以评估计划的鲁棒性。进行剂量学研究以比较基于内部目标量的稳健优化计划(ITV-IMRT和ITV-VMAT)和传统的基于PTV裕量的计划(PTV-IMRT和PTV-VMAT)。剂量学比较参数为:ITV目标平均剂量(Dmean),R95(D95 / Dprescription),帕迪克合格指数( style =“ fixed-case”> CI ),同质性指数( style =“ Fixed-case“> HI ),监视单位( style =” fixed-case“> MU )和 style =” fixed-case“> OAR 剂量,包括肺(Dmean,V20 Gy和V15 Gy),胸壁,心脏,食道和最大脐带剂量。优化结果的比较显示,健壮的优化计划具有更好的 style =“ fixed-case”> ITV 剂量覆盖率,更好的 style =“ fixed-case”> CI 和更差的 style =“ fixed-case”> HI ,并且 style =“ fixed-case”> OAR 剂量比常规 style =“ fixed-case”> PTV 余量低基于计划。计划健壮性评估表明,D99,D98和D95的扰动剂量都满足至少99%的 style =“ fixed-case”> ITV 接受95%的处方剂量。还观察到,基于 style =“ fixed-case”> PTV 保证金的计划具有比健壮的优化计划更高的 style =“ fixed-case”> PTV MU。结果还表明,强大的优化可以生成可增加 style =“ fixed-case”> OAR 保留的计划,尤其是对于正常的肺和 style =“ fixed-case”> OAR s接近或邻接目标。在正常肺部剂量和目标大小之间发现弱相关性,在这项研究中未观察到其他相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号