首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Medicine >Ibrutinib versus rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: a randomized open‐label phase 3 study
【2h】

Ibrutinib versus rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: a randomized open‐label phase 3 study

机译:依鲁替尼与利妥昔单抗治疗复发性或难治性慢性淋巴细胞性白血病或小淋巴细胞性淋巴瘤:一项随机开放标签的3期研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the Asia‐Pacific region, treatment options are limited for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Rituximab is widely used in this setting when purine analog‐based therapies are not appropriate. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib compared with rituximab in a randomized, open‐label phase 3 study in predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. Patients (N = 160) were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 420 mg ibrutinib (n = 106) until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity or up to six cycles of rituximab (n = 54). The primary endpoint was investigator‐assessed progression‐free survival (PFS); key secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Rituximab‐treated patients could crossover to receive ibrutinib after confirmed PD. At data cutoff, median treatment duration was 16.4 months for ibrutinib and 4.6 months for rituximab. Ibrutinib significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.180, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.105–0.308). ORR was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) with ibrutinib (53.8%) than with rituximab (7.4%). At a median follow‐up of 17.8 months, ibrutinib improved OS compared with rituximab (HR = 0.446; 95% CI: 0.221–0.900; P = 0.0206). Overall incidence of adverse events ( style="fixed-case">AEs) was similar between treatments and was not exposure‐adjusted. With ibrutinib, most common style="fixed-case">AEs were diarrhea and platelet count decreased; with rituximab, most common style="fixed-case">AEs were neutrophil count decreased and platelet count decreased. Grade ≥3 style="fixed-case">AEs were reported in 82.7% of ibrutinib‐treated patients and 59.6% of rituximab‐treated patients. Ibrutinib improved style="fixed-case">PFS, style="fixed-case"> ORR, and style="fixed-case">OS compared with rituximab and displayed a manageable safety profile in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory style="fixed-case">CLL/ style="fixed-case">SLL.
机译:在亚太地区,复发/难治性慢性淋巴细胞性白血病(CLL)/小淋巴细胞性淋巴瘤(SLL)患者的治疗选择有限。当不适合使用基于嘌呤类似物的疗法时,利妥昔单抗广泛用于这种情况。在一项随机,开放标签的第3期研究中,我们评估了主要在亚洲患有复发/难治性CLL / SLL患者的ibrutinib与rituximab相比的疗效和安全性。患者(N = 160)被随机分配为2:1接受420 mg依鲁替尼(n = 106),直到疾病进展(PD)或不可接受的毒性或最多六个周期的利妥昔单抗(n = 54)。主要终点是研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)。主要的次要终点是总体缓解率(ORR),总体生存率(OS)和安全性。确诊PD后,接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者可以交叉接受依鲁替尼治疗。数据截止时,依鲁替尼的中位治疗时间为16.4个月,利妥昔单抗的中位治疗时间为4.6个月。依鲁替尼可显着改善PFS(危险比[HR] = 0.180,95%置信区间[CI]:0.105-0.308)。依鲁替尼(53.8%)的ORR显着高于利妥昔单抗(7.4%)的ORR(P <0.0001)。在17.8个月的中位随访中,依鲁替尼比利妥昔单抗改善了OS(HR = 0.446; 95%CI:0.221-0.900; P = 0.0206)。治疗之间不良事件的总发生率( style =“ fixed-case”> AE s)相似,并且未经暴露调整。使用依鲁替尼时,最常见的 style =“ fixed-case”> AE 是腹泻,血小板计数降低。使用利妥昔单抗时,最常见的 style =“ fixed-case”> AE s是嗜中性粒细胞减少,血小板减少。据报道,接受依鲁替尼治疗的患者中82.7%和接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者中≥3 style =“ fixed-case”> AE s。依鲁替尼改善了 style =“ fixed-case”> PFS , style =“ fixed-case”> ORR 和 style =“ fixed-case”> OS 与利妥昔单抗相比,在亚洲复发/难治的 style =“ fixed-case”> CLL / style =“ fixed-case”> SLL 的亚洲患者中显示出可控的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号