首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Science >Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
【2h】

Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

机译:硼替佐米加地塞米松vs沙利度胺加地塞米松治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A randomized phase II selection design study (JCOG0904) was carried out to evaluate the more promising regimen between bortezomib (Bor) plus dexamethasone (Dex; BD) and thalidomide (Thal) plus Dex (TD) in Bor and Thal‐naïve patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients ≥20 and <80 years old with a documented diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) who received one or more prior therapies were randomized to receive BD (Bor 1.3 mg/m2) or TD (Thal 200 mg/d). In both arms, 8 cycles of induction (3‐week cycle) were followed by maintenance phase (5‐week cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. The primary end‐point was 1‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Forty‐four patients were randomized and assigned to receive BD and TD (n = 22, each group). At a median follow‐up of 34.3 months, the 1‐year PFS in the BD and TD arms were 45.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 24.4%‐64.3%) and 31.8% (95% CI, 14.2%‐51.1%), respectively, and the overall response rates were 77.3% and 40.9%, respectively. The 3‐year overall survival ( style="fixed-case">OS) was 70.0% (95% style="fixed-case">CI, 44.9%‐85.4%) in the style="fixed-case">BD, and 48.8% (95% style="fixed-case">CI, 25.1%‐69.0%) in the style="fixed-case">TD arm. Among grade 3/4 adverse events, thrombocytopenia (54.5% vs 0.0%) and sensory peripheral neuropathy (22.7% vs 9.1%) were more frequent in style="fixed-case">BD when compared with the style="fixed-case">TD arm. Patients treated with style="fixed-case">BD had better outcomes than those treated with style="fixed-case">TD with regard to 1‐year style="fixed-case">PFS and 3‐year style="fixed-case">OS. Thus, style="fixed-case">BD was prioritized over style="fixed-case">TD for further investigations in Bor and Thal‐naïve style="fixed-case">RRMM patients. (Clinical trial registration no. style="fixed-case">UMIN000003135.)
机译:进行了一项随机II期选择设计研究(JCOG0904),以评估硼替佐米(Bor)加地塞米松(Dex; BD)和沙利度胺(Thal)加Dex(TD)之间的更有希望的治疗方案,用于复发的Bor和Thal初治患者或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)。 ≥20岁且<80岁且已诊断为症状性多发性骨髓瘤(MM)且已接受一种或多种先前疗法的患者被随机分配接受BD(Bor 1.3 mg / m 2 )或TD(Thal 200毫克/天)。两组均进行8个诱导周期(3周周期),然后是维持阶段(5周周期),直到疾病进展,不可接受的毒性或患者拒绝治疗为止。主要终点是1年无进展生存期(PFS)。四十四例患者被随机分配接受BD和TD治疗(每组n = 22)。在34.3个月的中位随访中,BD和TD组的1年PFS分别为45.5%(95%置信区间(CI),24.4%-64.3%)和31.8%(95%CI,14.2%-总回应率分别为51.1%和77.3%和40.9%。 3年总生存率( style =“ fixed-case”> OS )为70.0%(95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI ,44.9%-85.4% )在 style =“ fixed-case”> BD 中,而48.8%(95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI 在25.1%-69.0%) span style =“ fixed-case”> TD 臂。在3/4级不良事件中, style =“ fixed-case”> BD 的血小板减少症(54.5%vs 0.0%)和感觉性周围神经病(22.7%vs 9.1%)的发生率高于 style =“ fixed-case”> TD 手臂。就 style =“ fixed-case”> BD 治疗的患者而言,一年 style = “ fixed-case”> PFS 和3年 style =“ fixed-case”> OS 。因此, style =“ fixed-case”> BD 优先于 style =“ fixed-case”> TD ,以便在Bor和Thal-naïve style =“ fixed -case“> RRMM 患者。 (临床试验注册号为 style =“ fixed-case”> UMIN 000003135。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号