首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Radiation Research >Comparison of implant quality between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds and loose seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy using sector analysis
【2h】

Comparison of implant quality between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds and loose seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy using sector analysis

机译:使用扇区分析比较永久性前列腺近距离放射治疗中术中定制的种子和疏松种子之间的植入物质量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compared the implant quality of intraoperatively built custom-linked (IBCL) seeds with loose seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy. Between June 2012 and January 2015, 64 consecutive prostate cancer patients underwent brachytherapy with IBCL seeds (n = 32) or loose seeds (n = 32). All the patients were treated with 144 Gy of brachytherapy alone. Brachytherapy was performed using a dynamic dose calculation technique. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging fusion-based dosimetry was performed 1 month after brachytherapy. Post-implant dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters, prostate sector dosimetry, operation time, seed migration, and toxicities were compared between the IBCL seed group and the loose seed group. A sector analysis tool was used to divide the prostate into six sectors (anterior and posterior sectors at the base, mid-gland, and apex). V100 (95.3% vs 89.7%; P = 0.014) and D90 (169.7 Gy vs 152.6 Gy; P = 0.013) in the anterior base sector were significantly higher in the IBCL seed group than in the loose seed group. The seed migration rate was significantly lower in the IBCL seed group than in the loose seed group (6% vs 66%; P < 0.001). Operation time per seed was significantly longer in the IBCL seed group than in the loose seed group (1.31 min vs 1.13 min; P = 0.003). Other post-implant DVH parameters and toxicities did not differ significantly between the two groups. Our study showed more dose coverage post-operatively in the anterior base prostate sector and less seed migration in IBCL seed implantation compared with loose seed implantation.
机译:我们在永久性前列腺近距离放射治疗中比较了术中定制的(IBCL)种子与疏松种子的植入质量。在2012年6月至2015年1月之间,连续64例前列腺癌患者接受了IBCL种子(n = 32)或疏松种子(n = 32)的近距离放射治疗。所有患者仅接受144 Gy近距离放射治疗。使用动态剂量计算技术进行近距离放射治疗。近距离放射治疗后1个月进行了基于计算机断层扫描/磁共振成像融合的剂量测定。比较了IBCL种子组和疏松种子组的植入后剂量-体积直方图(DVH)参数,前列腺区剂量,手术时间,种子迁移和毒性。使用扇区分析工具将前列腺分为六个扇区(在基部,中部和顶点的前部和后部)。 IBCL种子组前基区的V100(95.3%vs 89.7%; P = 0.014)和D90(169.7 Gy vs 152.6 Gy; P = 0.013)显着高于散种子组。 IBCL种子组的种子迁移率显着低于散种子组(6%vs 66%; P <0.001)。 IBCL种子组的每粒种子的操作时间比散种子组的要长得多(1.31分钟对1.13分钟; P = 0.003)。两组之间的其他植入后DVH参数和毒性没有显着差异。我们的研究显示,与散种子植入相比,IBCL种子植入术后前列腺根前区的剂量覆盖范围更大,种子迁移更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号