首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Zoology >Does social context affect boldness in juveniles?
【2h】

Does social context affect boldness in juveniles?

机译:社会环境是否会影响少年的胆识?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Differences in boldness are common between populations or between related species and are discussed as part of individual coping style, personality, or behavioral syndrome. Boldness has been found to be dependent on experience, social, and environmental contexts. The major aim of the present study was to establish an experimental environment that would allow analyzing the risk-taking behavior of 2 competing invasive goby species. Neogobius melanostomus was more active in the absence of a predator Sander lucioperca than N. fluviatilis and clearly spent more time “swimming” and “feeding” than N. fluviatilis. In addition, N. melanostomus was always faster than N. fluviatilis both when leaving the shelter and reaching offered food. Based on the different behaviors recorded, species-specific boldness scores were established using a principal component analysis. Although there was no overall difference in boldness scores between the 2 species, both competitive conditions and the effect of the predator played significant roles as factors influencing boldness. Neogobius melanostomus was more affected by the presence/absence of the predator than the social circumstances. Neogobius fluviatilis, on the other hand, was more active and bolder in competitive situations. However, when alone, N. fluviatilis was rather inactive and displayed altogether shy behavior, independent of the presence/absence of the predator. Thus, the study confirms the prediction that there are differences in behavior and behavioral plasticity, and therein predator-avoidance strategies, between ecologically similar species of goby living in sympatry. We argue that these differences may be related to differential habitat use of both invasive species that presently dominate the fish community in the Lower Rhine.
机译:种群之间或相关物种之间的粗体差异很常见,并作为个体应对方式,个性或行为综合症的一部分进行讨论。发现胆量取决于经验,社会和环境背景。本研究的主要目的是建立一个实验环境,以分析两种竞争性入侵虾虎鱼物种的冒险行为。在没有捕食者Sander lucioperca的情况下,黑腹线虫比沙门氏菌更活跃,并且显然比“沙门氏菌”花更多的时间“游泳”和“喂养”。此外,在离开庇护所并到达提供的食物时,黑变种猪笼草总是比流感猪笼草快。基于记录的不同行为,使用主成分分析建立了特定于物种的大胆评分。尽管这两个物种之间的胆量得分没有总体差异,但是竞争条件和捕食者的作用均是影响胆量的重要因素。食肉动物的存在与否比起社会环境,更受黑猩猩的影响。另一方面,在竞争情况下,河豚Neogobius fluviatilis更加活跃和大胆。但是,单独存在时,河豚猪笼草相当不活跃,并且表现出完全害羞的行为,与捕食者的有无无关。因此,这项研究证实了这一预测,即生活在共生系统中的虾虎鱼生态相似物种之间在行为和行为可塑性上存在差异,并且在避免捕食者的策略中也存在差异。我们认为,这些差异可能与目前在莱茵河下游鱼类群落中占主导地位的两种入侵物种的栖息地利用差异有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号