首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience >ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters
【2h】

ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters

机译:ERP与激励声音相关:激励质量和时程至关重要

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Here, we conducted the first study to explore how motivations expressed through speech are processed in real-time. Participants listened to sentences spoken in two types of well-studied motivational tones (autonomy-supportive and controlling), or a neutral tone of voice. To examine this, listeners were presented with sentences that either signaled motivations through prosody (tone of voice) and words simultaneously (e.g. ‘You absolutely have to do it my way’ spoken in a controlling tone of voice), or lacked motivationally biasing words (e.g. ‘Why don’t we meet again tomorrow’ spoken in a motivational tone of voice). Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in response to motivations conveyed through words and prosody showed that listeners rapidly distinguished between motivations and neutral forms of communication as shown in enhanced P2 amplitudes in response to motivational when compared with neutral speech. This early detection mechanism is argued to help determine the importance of incoming information. Once assessed, motivational language is continuously monitored and thoroughly evaluated. When compared with neutral speech, listening to controlling (but not autonomy-supportive) speech led to enhanced late potential ERP mean amplitudes, suggesting that listeners are particularly attuned to controlling messages. The importance of controlling motivation for listeners is mirrored in effects observed for motivations expressed through prosody only. Here, an early rapid appraisal, as reflected in enhanced P2 amplitudes, is only found for sentences spoken in controlling (but not autonomy-supportive) prosody. Once identified as sounding pressuring, the message seems to be preferentially processed, as shown by enhanced late potential amplitudes in response to controlling prosody. Taken together, results suggest that motivational and neutral language are differentially processed; further, the data suggest that listening to cues signaling pressure and control cannot be ignored and lead to preferential, and more in-depth processing mechanisms.
机译:在这里,我们进行了第一项研究,以探讨如何实时处理通过语音表达的动机。参与者听了两种经过充分研究的动机语调(自主支持和控制)或中性的语调所讲的句子。为了对此进行检查,听众会看到一些句子,这些句子要么通过韵律(语气)发出信号,要么通过单词同时发出言语(例如,“您绝对必须按照自己的方式做”以控制性的语调发声),或者缺乏激励性的偏见词语(例如,以激励的语气说“为什么我们明天不再见面”。与通过言语和韵律传达的动机相关的事件相关脑电势(ERP)显示,与中性语音相比,听众可以迅速区分动机和中性交流形式,如对动机的P2振幅增强。有人认为这种早期发现机制有助于确定传入信息的重要性。一旦进行了评估,就会不断监测激励语言并进行彻底评估。与中性语音相比,收听控制性语音(而非支持自主性的语音)会导致后期潜在的ERP平均幅度增加,这表明收听者特别喜欢控制消息。控制听众动机的重要性反映在仅通过韵律表达的动机观察到的效果中。在此,仅针对控制(但不支持自主)韵律中的句子,发现了早期快速评估,反映为P2幅度增强。一旦确定为发声压力,该消息似乎将得到优先处理,如响应控制韵律而增加的后期电位幅度所示。两者合计,结果表明动机性语言和中性语言得到了不同的处理。此外,数据表明,听取信号压力和控制的提示是不容忽视的,并会导致优先和更深入的处理机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号