首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience >Does transcranial direct current stimulation to the prefrontal cortex affect social behavior? A meta-analysis
【2h】

Does transcranial direct current stimulation to the prefrontal cortex affect social behavior? A meta-analysis

机译:经颅直流电刺激前额叶皮层会影响社交行为吗?荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This meta-analysis (k = 48, N = 2196) examined the effect of transcranial direct current brain stimulation (tDCS) applied to the prefrontal cortex on a variety of social behaviors, including aggression, overeating, impulsivity, bias, honesty, and risk-taking. tDCS showed an overall significant effect on reducing undesirable behaviors, with an average effect size of d = −0.20. tDCS was most effective at reducing risk-taking behavior, bias, and overeating. tDCS did not affect aggression, impulsivity, or dishonesty. We examined moderators such as brain region of interest, online vs offline stimulation, within- vs between-subjects designs, dose, and duration, but none showed significant interactions. We also tested for potential publication bias using two different tools, which indicated signs of publication bias in the literature. After correcting for potential publication bias, the effect of tDCS was still significant, but the size was reduced (d = −0.10). These findings suggest the presence of tDCS studies with null findings outside of the published literature. Taken together, these results suggest that although tDCS can reduce undesirable behaviors, researchers should consider the types of behaviors they measure and use strategies to ensure sufficient power to detect a possible effect of tDCS on social behavior.
机译:这项荟萃分析(k = 48,N = 2196)研究了经颅直流电脑刺激(tDCS)应用于前额叶皮层对多种社会行为的影响,包括攻击性,暴饮暴食,冲动,偏见,诚实和风险-采取。 tDCS在减少不良行为方面显示出总体显着效果,平均影响大小为d = -0.20。 tDCS在减少冒险行为,偏见和暴饮暴食方面最有效。 tDCS不会影响攻击性,冲动性或不诚实性。我们检查了主持人,例如感兴趣的大脑区域,在线与离线刺激,受试者内部与受试者之间的设计,剂量和持续时间,但没有一个显示出显着的相互作用。我们还使用两种不同的工具测试了潜在的出版偏倚,这表明了文献中出现出版偏倚的迹象。在校正潜在的发布偏见之后,tDCS的影响仍然很明显,但是大小减小了(d = -0.10)。这些发现表明存在tDCS研究,而在已发表的文献之外没有发现。综上,这些结果表明,尽管tDCS可以减少不良行为,但研究人员应考虑他们测量的行为类型,并使用策略来确保有足够的能力来检测tDCS对社会行为的可能影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号