首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Molecular and Clinical Oncology >Multimodal treatment for local recurrent malignant gliomas: Resurgery and/or reirradiation followed by chemotherapy
【2h】

Multimodal treatment for local recurrent malignant gliomas: Resurgery and/or reirradiation followed by chemotherapy

机译:局部复发性恶性神经胶质瘤的多模式治疗:手术和/或再放射再化疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The therapeutic management of recurrent malignant gliomas (MGs) is not determined. Therefore, the efficacy of a multimodal approach and a combination systemic therapy was investigated. A retrospective analysis of 26 MGs patients at first relapse treated with multimodal therapy (chemotherapy plus surgery and/or reirradiation) or chemotherapy alone was performed. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of fotemustine (FTM) in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) (cFTM/BEV) or followed by third-line BEV (sFTM/BEV). Subgroup analyses were performed. Multimodal therapy provided a higher overall response rate (ORR) (73 vs. 47%), disease control rate (DCR) (82 vs. 67%), median progression-free survival (mPFS) (11 vs. 7 months; P=0.08) and median overall survival (mOS) (13 vs. 8 months; P=0.04) compared with chemotherapy. Concomitant FTM/BEV resulted in higher ORR (84 vs. 36%), DCR (92 vs. 57%), mPFS (10 vs. 5 months; P=0.22) and mOS (11 vs. 5.2 months; P=0.15) compared with sFTM/BEV. Methylated patients did not experience additional survival benefits with multimodality treatment but had higher mPFS (10 vs 7.1 months; P=0.33) and mOS (11 vs. 8 months; P=0.33) with cFTM/BEV. Unmethylated patients experienced the greatest survival benefit with the multimodal approach (mPFS: 10 vs. 5 months; mOS 11 vs 6 months; both P=0.02) and cFTM/BEV (mPFS: 5 vs. 2 months; mOS 6 vs. 3.2 months; both P=0.01). In conclusion, in recurrent MGs, multimodal therapy and cFTM/BEV provide survival and response benefits. Methylated patients benefit from a cFTM/BEV but not from a multimodal approach. Notably, unmethylated patients had the highest survival benefit with the two strategies.
机译:复发性恶性神经胶质瘤(MGs)的治疗管理尚未确定。因此,研究了多模式方法和全身联合治疗的疗效。回顾性分析了26例重症肌无力患者在首次复发时接受了多模式疗法(化学疗法加手术和/或再照射)或单独进行了化疗。二线化疗由曲莫司汀(FTM)与贝伐单抗(BEV)(cFTM / BEV)组合而成,或由三线BEV(sFTM / BEV)组成。进行亚组分析。多模式疗法提供更高的总体缓解率(ORR)(73比47%),疾病控制率(DCR)(82比67%),中位无进展生存期(mPFS)(11比7个月; P = 0.08)和中位总生存期(mOS)(13 vs. 8个月; P = 0.04)。伴随的FTM / BEV导致较高的ORR(84 vs. 36%),DCR(92 vs. 57%),mPFS(10 vs. 5个月; P = 0.22)和mOS(11 vs. 5.2个月; P = 0.15)与sFTM / BEV相比。使用cFTM / BEV进行多模态治疗后,甲基化患者没有其他生存获益,但其mPFS(10 vs 7.1个月; P = 0.33)和mOS较高(11 vs. 8个月; P = 0.33)。未甲基化的患者通过多模式方法(mPFS:10 vs. 5个月; mOS 11 vs 6个月;均P = 0.02)和cFTM / BEV(mPFS:5 vs. 2个月; mOS 6 vs. 3.2个月)获得了最大的生存获益。 ;两个P = 0.01)。总之,在复发性重症肌无力中,多式联运疗法和cFTM / BEV可提供生存和缓解获益。甲基化患者将从cFTM / BEV中受益,但不能从多模式方法中受益。值得注意的是,采用这两种策略,未甲基化的患者具有最高的生存获益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号