首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Korean Medical Science >Comparison of Hospital Charge Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer Patients: Neural Network vs. Decision Tree Models
【2h】

Comparison of Hospital Charge Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer Patients: Neural Network vs. Decision Tree Models

机译:大肠癌患者住院费用预测模型的比较:神经网络模型与决策树模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Analysis and prediction of the care charges related to colorectal cancer in Korea are important for the allocation of medical resources and the establishment of medical policies because the incidence and the hospital charges for colorectal cancer are rapidly increasing. But the previous studies based on statistical analysis to predictthe hospital charges for patients did not show satisfactory results. Recently, data mining emerges as a new technique to extract knowledge from the huge and diverse medical data. Thus, we built models using data mining techniques to predict hospital charge for the patients. A total of 1,022 admission records with 154 variables of 492 patients were used to build prediction models who had been treated from 1999 to 2002 in the Kyung Hee University Hospital. We built an artificial neural network (ANN) model and a classification and regression tree (CART) model, and compared their prediction accuracy. Linear correlation coefficients were high in both models and the mean absolute errors were similar. But ANN models showed a better linear correlation than CART model (0.813 vs. 0.713 for the hospital charge paid by insurance and 0.746 vs. 0.720 for the hospital charge paid by patients). We suggest that ANN model has a better performance to predict charges of colorectal cancer patients.
机译:由于大肠癌的发病率和住院费用正在迅速增加,因此在韩国,与大肠癌有关的护理费用的分析和预测对于医疗资源的分配和医疗政策的制定非常重要。但是,以前基于统计分析预测患者住院费用的研究并未取得令人满意的结果。最近,数据挖掘作为一种从大量多样的医学数据中提取知识的新技术应运而生。因此,我们使用数据挖掘技术构建了模型来预测患者的医院费用。总共1,022份入院记录和492位患者的154个变量用于建立预测模型,该模型从1999年至2002年在庆熙大学医院接受了治疗。我们建立了人工神经网络(ANN)模型和分类回归树(CART)模型,并比较了它们的预测准确性。两种模型的线性相关系数都很高,平均绝对误差也相似。但是ANN模型显示出比CART模型更好的线性相关性(保险支付的医院费用为0.813 vs. 0.713,患者支付的医院费用为0.746 vs. 0.720)。我们建议人工神经网络模型具有更好的性能来预测结直肠癌患者的费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号