首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Molecular and Clinical Oncology >Clinical significance of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer evaluated by propensity score matching and weighting of inverse probability of treatment
【2h】

Clinical significance of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer evaluated by propensity score matching and weighting of inverse probability of treatment

机译:通过倾向评分匹配和治疗逆向权重评估术前放化疗对晚期食管癌的临床意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) to compare survival benefits among 112 patients with resectable, stage II–IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated between 1996 and 2016 with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NAC) plus surgery (Group A, n=55) or with surgery alone (Group B, n=57). Their propensity scores (PS) were calculated using a multivariable logistic regression model in which age, sex, cancer site, primary tumor length, cTNM stage, lymph node metastasis and depth of tumor invasion were the independent variables, and used to match Groups A and B according to the IPTW and matching method. After IPTW and PSM, univariate analysis was used to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), followed by Cox proportional hazard models for OS using IPTW between the two groups and the subgroups. After PSM, 5-year OS and DFS were significantly higher in Group A (OS: 65.2%, DFS: 65.2%) compared with Group B (OS: 31.2%, DFS: 20.87%). Similarly, after IPTW, OS and DFS were significantly higher in Group A compared with Group B patients. Five-year OS was 73.18% for Group A and 37.69% for Group B (hazard ratio: 0.2899, 95% confidence interval: 0.1167–0.7205). To conclude, treatment was more effective in Group A patients with clinical stage II, N0 and T3 disease involving the mid-esophagus. It was concluded that for patients with esophageal SCC, NAC plus esophagectomy exhibited improved survival compared with surgery alone, as demonstrated by use of IPTW and PSM methods.
机译:本研究使用治疗加权比值(IPTW)和倾向评分匹配(PSM)的倒数比较了1996年至2016年间接受新辅助放化疗的112例可切除的II-IV期食管鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者的生存获益。 )加手术(A组,n = 55)或单独进行手术(B组,n = 57)。他们的倾向评分(PS)是使用多变量logistic回归模型计算的,其中年龄,性别,癌症部位,原发肿瘤长度,cTNM分期,淋巴结转移和肿瘤浸润深度是独立变量,并用于匹配A组和B根据IPTW和匹配方法。在IPTW和PSM之后,使用单变量分析评估总体生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),然后在两组和亚组之间使用IPTW评估OS的Cox比例风险模型。 PSM后,A组的5年OS和DFS显着高于B组(OS:31.2%,DFS:20.87%)(OS:65.2%,DFS:65.2%)。同样,IPTW后,A组的OS和DFS明显高于B组。 A组和B组的五年OS为73.18%,B组为37.69%(危险比:0.2899,95%置信区间:0.1167-0.7205)。总而言之,对于临床上涉及食道中段,II期,N0和T3期疾病的A组患者,治疗更为有效。结论是,对于IPCC和PSM方法,与单独手术相比,NAC联合食管切除术对食管SCC患者具有更好的生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号