首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Predictive accuracy of partial coherence interferometry and swept-source optical coherence tomography for intraocular lens power calculation
【2h】

Predictive accuracy of partial coherence interferometry and swept-source optical coherence tomography for intraocular lens power calculation

机译:预测部分相干干涉法和扫频光学相干断层扫描用于人工晶状体屈光度的预测精度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study is to compare the predictive accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations made with partial coherence interferometry (PCI, IOLMaster, version 5) and swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, Argos). Axial length (AL), mean keratometry value (K), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were obtained using PCI and SS-OCT optical biometers. Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations were made using the Barret-Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, SRK/T, and T2 formulas and compared the predictive accuracy between biometers. In 153 eyes (153 patients), axial length measurements made with PCI (24.65 ± 2.35 mm) and SS-OCT (24.62 ± 2.29 mm) were significantly different (P < 0.001). Corneal power (P = 0.97) and anterior chamber depth (P = 0.51) were not significantly different between biometer. The mean absolute error was not significantly different between the five IOL power calculation formulas for either PCI or SS-OCT measurements. When AL was 24.5–26.0 mm, mean absolute error derived from SS-OCT was smaller than mean absolute error derived from PCI for all five IOL power calculation formulas (all P < 0.05). In conclusion, predictive accuracy of PCI and SS-OCT were nearly the same. However, in medium-long eyes, the predictive accuracy of SS-OCT for IOL calculations was higher.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较部分相干干涉术(PCI,IOLMaster,版本5)和扫频光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT,Argos)进行的人工晶状体(IOL)计算的预测准确性。使用PCI和SS-OCT光学生物测量仪获得轴长(AL),平均角膜曲率值(K)和前房深度(ACD)。使用Barret-Universal II,Haigis,Hoffer Q,SRK / T和T2公式进行了人工晶状体(IOL)屈光度计算,并比较了生物计数仪之间的预测准确性。在153眼(153例患者)中,PCI(24.65±2.35mm)和SS-OCT(24.62±2.29mm)的轴向长度测量值有显着差异(P <0.001)。两种生物测定仪之间角膜屈光力(P = 0.97)和前房深度(P = 0.51)没有显着差异。用于PCI或SS-OCT测量的五个IOL功率计算公式之间的平均绝对误差没有显着差异。当AL为24.5–26.0 mm时,对于所有五个IOL功率计算公式,从SS-OCT得出的平均绝对误差都小于从PCI得出的平均绝对误差(所有P <0.05)。总之,PCI和SS-OCT的预测准确性几乎相同。但是,在中长眼中,SS-OCT用于IOL计算的预测准确性较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号