首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases
【2h】

Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

机译:预测蜂群对土地利用变化的反应:地理和分类偏向的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises.
机译:土地用途的变化和集约化威胁着全世界的蜜蜂种群,危及授粉服务。需要全球模型来更好地表征,预测和减轻蜜蜂对这些人类影响的反应。但是,可用的数据在地理和分类上都不具有代表性。大多数数据来自北美和西欧,它们代表了大黄蜂,并引起人们对模型结果可能无法推广到其他地区和生物分类的担忧。为了评估数据的地理和分类偏向是否会破坏保护政策模型的有效性,我们从已发表的文献中整理了面临土地利用变化和集约化的地点的蜜蜂多样性全球数据集,并评估了蜜蜂对这些压力的反应在大黄蜂和其他蜜蜂之间的11个地区(西欧,北欧,东欧和南欧,北美洲,中南美洲,澳大利亚和新西兰,东南亚,中南部非洲)有所不同。我们的分析强调,由于物种敏感性和潜在威胁性质的差异,在区域总面积,物种丰富度和辛普森对土地利用的多样性方面,存在强烈的区域性反应。这些结果表明,基于地理和分类学上受限制的数据对模型进行全球外推可能会低估真正的不确定性,从而增加了生态意外的风险。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号