首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Efficacy and safety of core-needle biopsy in initially detected thyroid nodules via propensity score analysis
【2h】

Efficacy and safety of core-needle biopsy in initially detected thyroid nodules via propensity score analysis

机译:通过倾向评分分析对初次发现的甲状腺结节进行穿刺活检的有效性和安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compared the efficacy and complications of core-needle biopsy (CNB) with those of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in a large population of patients with initially detected thyroid nodules via a propensity score analysis. Outpatients with initially detected thyroid nodules, who had undergone CNB or FNA between January 2013 and December 2013, were selected. This study included 4,822 thyroid nodules from 4,553 consecutive patients. Adjustments for significant differences in patients’ baseline characteristics were facilitated via propensity score analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed according to nodule sizes ≥ 1 cm. The non-diagnostic result rate, malignancy rate, complication rate, and diagnostic accuracy were compared. A 1:1 matching of 1,615 patients yielded no significant differences between two groups for any covariate. The non-diagnostic result rate was significantly lower in the core-needle biopsy group than in the fine-needle aspiration group (5.2% vs. 12.1%), while the malignancy rate (23.7% vs. 11.8%) and sensitivity (75.9% vs. 55.6%) were significantly higher. However, the specificities were similar (100% and 99.9%, respectively). Propensity score and subgroup analyses showed similar results. The complication rate was similar between groups in matched cohorts. CNB is a promising and safe diagnostic tool for patients with initially detected thyroid nodules.
机译:我们通过倾向评分分析比较了在最初发现的甲状腺结节的大量患者中,核心针穿刺活检(CNB)和细针穿刺活检(FNA)的疗效和并发症。选择了在2013年1月至2013年12月之间接受过CNB或FNA的初次发现甲状腺结节的门诊患者。该研究纳入了连续4,553位患者的4,822个甲状腺结节。通过倾向评分分析,可以对患者基线特征的显着差异进行调整。根据结节大小≥1 cm进行亚组分析。比较非诊断结果率,恶性率,并发症发生率和诊断准确性。 1:1匹配的1,615名患者在两组之间的任何协变量均无显着差异。穿刺针活检组的非诊断结果率明显低于细针穿刺组(5.2%vs. 12.1%),而恶性率(23.7%vs. 11.8%)和敏感性(75.9%)对比55.6%)。但是,特异性相似(分别为100%和99.9%)。倾向得分和亚组分析显示相似的结果。匹配队列中各组之间的并发症发生率相似。对于最初发现甲状腺结节的患者,CNB是一种有前途且安全的诊断工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号