首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medical Ethics >Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not
【2h】

Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not

机译:杀人:康德关于自杀和安乐死的说法但没有

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An agent who takes his own life acts in violation of the moral law, according to Kant; suicide, and, by extension, assisted suicide are therefore wrong. By a similar argument, and with a few important exceptions, killing is wrong; implicitly, then, voluntary euthanasia is also wrong. Kant's conclusions are uncompelling and his argument in these matters is undermined on considering other areas of his thought. Kant, in forbidding suicide and euthanasia, is conflating respect for persons and respect for people, and assuming that, in killing a person (either oneself or another), we are thereby undermining personhood. But an argument along these lines is faulty according to Kant's own standards. There is no reason why Kantians have to accept that self‐killing and euthanasia are contrary to the moral law. Even if some Kantians adhere to this doctrine, others can reject it.
机译:康德认为,一个自杀者的行为违反了道德法则。因此,自杀以及进一步的辅助自杀是错误的。用类似的观点,除了一些重要的例外,杀人是错误的。因此,暗中地,自愿安乐死也是错误的。康德的结论令人信服,考虑到他的思想的其他方面,损害了他在这些问题上的论点。康德在禁止自杀和安乐死的同时,将对人的尊重与对人的尊重混为一谈,并假设在杀死一个人(一个人或另一个人)时,我们正在破坏人格。但是按照康德自己的标准,按照这些思路进行辩论是错误的。康德人没有理由不接受自我杀戮和安乐死违反道德法则的理由。即使有些康德人坚持这一学说,其他人也可以拒绝它。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 Journal of Medical Ethics
  • 作者

    I Brassington;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2006(32),10
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 571–574
  • 总页数 4
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 病理学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号