首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncology Letters >Application evaluation of DCE-MRI combined with quantitative analysis of DWI for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
【2h】

Application evaluation of DCE-MRI combined with quantitative analysis of DWI for the diagnosis of prostate cancer

机译:DCE-MRI结合DWI定量分析在前列腺癌诊断中的应用评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study aimed to investigate the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) combined with quantitative analysis of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). A total of 81 patients with prostatic diseases, including PCa (n=44) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, n=37), were imaged with T1 weighted imaging (T1WI), T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), DWI and DCE-MRI. The blood vessel permeability parameters volume transfer rate constant (Ktrans), back flow rate constant (Kep), extravascular extracellular space volume fraction (Ve), plasma volume fraction (Vp) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured, and compared between the two groups. The efficiency of these tools for the diagnosis of PCa was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The efficiency of ADC combined with blood vessel permeability parameters in the diagnosis of PCa was analyzed by logistic regression. The correlation between these parameters and the Gleason score was evaluated by Spearman correlation analysis in the PCa group. The results demonstrated that, compared with the BPH group, Ktrans, Kep, Ve and Vp were higher, and ADC was lower in the PCa group (P<0.05). The combination of Kep and ADC offered the highest diagnosis efficiency [area under the curve (AUC=0.939)]. However, the combination of three parameters did not significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency. A subtle improvement in diagnostic efficiency was observed when four parameters (Ktrans + Kep + Ve + ADC) were combined (AUC=0.940), which was significantly higher than with one parameter. The ADC value of the PCa group was negatively correlated with the primary Gleason pattern, secondary Gleason pattern and the total Gleason score in PCa (r=−0.665, −0.456 and −0.714, respectively; P<0.001). The Vp in the PCa group was slightly negatively correlated with the primary Gleason pattern of PCa (r=−0.385; P<0.05); however, no significant correlation was found with secondary Gleason pattern and the total Gleason score. The present study revealed that the combination of DCE-MRI quantitative analysis and DWI was efficient for PCa diagnosis. This may be because DCE-MRI and DWI can noninvasively detect water motility in tumor tissues and alterations in permeability during tumor neovascularization. The present study demonstrated that Kep and ADC values may be used as predictive parameters for PCa diagnosis, which may help differentiate benign from malignant prostate lesions.
机译:本研究旨在探讨动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)与弥散加权成像(DWI)定量分析相结合对前列腺癌(PCa)诊断的价值。通过T1加权成像(T1WI),T2加权成像(T2WI),DWI和DCE-MRI对总共81例前列腺疾病患者进行了成像,包括PCa(n = 44)和良性前列腺增生(BPH,n = 37)。 。血管渗透性参数体积传输速率常数(K trans ),回流速率常数(Kep),血管外细胞空间体积分数(Ve),血浆体积分数(Vp)和表观扩散系数(ADC) ),然后在两组之间进行比较。通过接收机工作特性曲线分析来分析这些工具对PCa的诊断效率。通过logistic回归分析ADC结合血管渗透性参数对PCa的诊断效率。在PCa组中,通过Spearman相关分析评估了这些参数与Gleason评分之间的相关性。结果表明,与BPH组相比,PCa组的K trans ,Kep,Ve和Vp较高,而ADC较低(P <0.05)。 Kep和ADC的组合提供了最高的诊断效率[曲线下面积(AUC = 0.939)]。但是,三个参数的组合并不能显着提高诊断效率。当组合四个参数(K trans + Kep + Ve + ADC)(AUC = 0.940)时,观察到诊断效率的微妙改善,这明显高于一个参数。 PCa组的ADC值与PCa的主要Gleason模式,次要Gleason模式和总Gleason得分呈负相关(分别为r = -0.665,-0.456和-0.714; P <0.001)。 PCa组的Vp与PCa的主要Gleason模式略有负相关(r = -0.385; P <0.05);然而,未发现与次要格里森模式和总格里森分数显着相关。本研究表明,DCE-MRI定量分析和DWI的结合对于PCa诊断是有效的。这可能是因为DCE-MRI和DWI可以无创地检测肿瘤组织中的水运动性以及肿瘤新血管形成过程中通透性的变化。本研究表明,Kep和ADC值可以用作PCa诊断的预测参数,这可能有助于区分良性和恶性前列腺病变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号