首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Systematic Biology >Conserved Nonexonic Elements: A Novel Class of Marker for Phylogenomics
【2h】

Conserved Nonexonic Elements: A Novel Class of Marker for Phylogenomics

机译:保守的非xoniconic元素:新型的植物药理标记

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Noncoding markers have a particular appeal as tools for phylogenomic analysis because, at least in vertebrates, they appear less subject to strong variation in GC content among lineages. Thus far, ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and introns have been the most widely used noncoding markers. Here we analyze and study the evolutionary properties of a new type of noncoding marker, conserved nonexonic elements (CNEEs), which consists of noncoding elements that are estimated to evolve slower than the neutral rate across a set of species. Although they often include UCEs, CNEEs are distinct from UCEs because they are not ultraconserved, and, most importantly, the core region alone is analyzed, rather than both the core and its flanking regions. Using a data set of 16 birds plus an alligator outgroup, and  ∼ 3600– ∼ 3800 loci per marker type, we found that although CNEEs were less variable than bioinformatically derived UCEs or introns and in some cases exhibited a slower approach to branch resolution as determined by phylogenomic subsampling, the quality of CNEE alignments was superior to those of the other markers, with fewer gaps and missing species. Phylogenetic resolution using coalescent approaches was comparable among the three marker types, with most nodes being fully and congruently resolved. Comparison of phylogenetic results across the three marker types indicated that one branch, the sister group to the passerine +  falcon clade, was resolved differently and with moderate (  70%) bootstrap support between CNEEs and UCEs or introns. Overall, CNEEs appear to be promising as phylogenomic markers, yielding phylogenetic resolution as high as for UCEs and introns but with fewer gaps, less ambiguity in alignments and with patterns of nucleotide substitution more consistent with the assumptions of commonly used methods of phylogenetic analysis.
机译:非编码标记物作为系统生物学分析工具具有特别的吸引力,因为至少在脊椎动物中,非编码标记物的谱系间受GC含量变化的影响较小。迄今为止,超保守元件(UCE)和内含子已成为使用最广泛的非编码标记。在这里,我们分析并研究了一种新型的非编码标记物,保守的非外显子元件(CNEEs)的进化特性,它由非编码元件组成,这些非编码元件估计在一组物种中的进化速度比中性速率慢。尽管CNEE通常包含UCE,但它们不是UCE,因为它们不是超保守的,最重要的是,仅分析核心区域,而不是分析核心区域及其侧翼区域。使用16只鸟和一个鳄鱼外群的数据集,每个标记类型约3600-3800个基因座,我们发现尽管CNEE的变异性小于生物信息学衍生的UCE或内含子,但在某些情况下,确定的分支分辨力方法较慢通过植物学亚采样,CNEE序列比对标记的质量要好于其他标记,具有较少的缺口和缺失的物种。使用聚结方法的系统发生分辨率在这三种标记类型之间是可比的,大多数节点都可以完全一致地分辨。三种标记类型的系统发育结果比较表明,一个分支(雀形+猎鹰进化枝的姊妹组)的分辨方式不同,并且在CNEE和UCE或内含子之间具有中等(> 70%)的自举支持。总体而言,CNEEs有望作为植物学标记,其系统发育分辨率与UCE和内含子一样高,但缺口较小,比对较少,核苷酸取代方式更符合系统发育分析常用方法的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号