首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Psychological Science >Really? She blicked the baby?: Two-year-olds Learn Combinatorial Facts about Verbs By Listening
【2h】

Really? She blicked the baby?: Two-year-olds Learn Combinatorial Facts about Verbs By Listening

机译:真?她为婴儿lick嘴了吗?:两岁的孩子通过听来学习有关动词的组合事实

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Children use syntax to guide verb learning. We asked whether the syntactic structure in which a novel verb occurs is meaningful to children even without a concurrent scene from which to infer the verb’s semantic content. In two experiments, 2-year-olds observed dialogues in which interlocutors used a new verb in transitive (“Jane blicked the baby!”) or intransitive sentences (“Jane blicked!”). Children later heard the verb in isolation (“Find blicking!”) while watching a one-participant and a two-participant event presented side-by-side. Children who had heard transitive dialogues looked reliably longer at the two-participant event than did those who had heard intransitive dialogues. This effect persisted even when children were tested on a different day, but disappeared when no novel verb accompanied the test events (Experiment 2). Thus, 2-year-olds gather useful combinatorial information about a novel verb based simply on hearing it in sentences, and later retrieve that information to guide verb interpretation.
机译:儿童使用语法指导动词学习。我们问,即使没有同时从中推断出动词语义内容的场景,出现新动词的句法结构是否对儿童有意义?在两个实验中,两岁的孩子观察到对话,对话者在和声中使用了新动词(“简·布莱克婴儿!”)或不及物动词(“简·布莱克!”)。随后,孩子们一边观看并排呈现的一个参与者和一个两个参与者的事件,一边孤立地听到了动词(“ Find blicking!”)。与参加过不及格对话的孩子相比,参加过及格对话的孩子在两人参加的活动中看起来更长。即使在不同的一天对孩子进行测试,这种效果也仍然存在,但是当没有新的动词伴随测试事件出现时,这种效果就消失了(实验2)。因此,2岁的儿童仅基于在句子中的听觉就收集了有关一个新动词的有用组合信息,然后检索该信息以指导动词解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号