首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Mutagenesis >XPA impacts formation but not proteasome-sensitive repair of DNA–protein cross-links induced by chromate
【2h】

XPA impacts formation but not proteasome-sensitive repair of DNA–protein cross-links induced by chromate

机译:XPA影响铬酸盐诱导的DNA-蛋白质交联的形成但不影响蛋白酶体敏感性修复

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

DNA–protein cross-links (DPCs) are caused by a large number of human carcinogens and anti-cancer drugs. However, cellular processes involved in decreasing a burden of these genotoxic lesions remain poorly understood. Here, we examined the impact of nucleotide excision repair (NER), which is a principal repair pathway for bulky DNA adducts, and the main cellular reducers on removal of chromium(VI)-induced DPC. We found that standard and ascorbate-restored cultures of isogenic XPA-null (NER deficient) and XPA-complemented human fibroblasts had very similar repair of Cr–DPC (60–65% average DPC removal after 24 h). However, XPA absence caused depletion of G1 and accumulation of G2 cells at low Cr(VI) doses, suggesting that Cr–DPC were not a significant cause of cell cycle perturbations. Interestingly, although pro-oxidant metabolism of Cr(VI) in glutathione-depleted cells generated significantly fewer DPC, they were repair resistant irrespective of the NER status of cells. Inhibition of proteasome activity by MG132 abolished DPC repair in both XPA-null and XPA-complemented cells. XPA loss caused two to three times higher initial DPC formation, demonstrating the importance of NER in removal of the precursor lesions. Our results indicate that human NER is not involved in removal of Cr–DPC containing non-histone proteins but it acts as a defence mechanism against these large lesions by preventing their formation. Therefore, individual differences in NER activity are expected to alter sensitivity but not persistence of DPC as a biomarker of hexavalent Cr.
机译:DNA-蛋白质交联(DPC)是由大量人类致癌物和抗癌药引起的。然而,涉及降低这些遗传毒性损害负担的细胞过程仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们检查了核苷酸切除修复(NER)(这是大体积DNA加合物的主要修复途径)以及主要细胞还原剂对铬(VI)诱导的DPC去除的影响。我们发现同基因的XPA无效(NER缺陷)和XPA补充的人类成纤维细胞的标准培养物和抗坏血酸修复物对Cr-DPC的修复非常相似(24小时后平均DPC去除率为60-65%)。但是,缺乏XPA会导致低Cr(VI)剂量下G1的消耗和G2细胞的积累,这表明Cr–DPC不是细胞周期扰动的重要原因。有趣的是,尽管在耗尽谷胱甘肽的细胞中Cr(VI)的促氧化剂代谢产生的DPC明显减少,但无论细胞的NER状态如何,它们都具有抗修复性。 MG132抑制蛋白酶体的活性消除了XPA无效和XPA互补细胞中的DPC修复。 XPA丢失导致初始DPC形成增加了2到3倍,这表明NER在清除前体病变中的重要性。我们的结果表明,人类NER不参与去除含非组蛋白的Cr-DPC,但通过阻止其形成,可作为针对这些大病变的防御机制。因此,预期NER活性的个体差异会改变敏感性,但不会改变DPC作为六价Cr生物标志物的持久性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号